The OHRP and SUPPORT
A group of medical ethicists and pediatricians asks for reconsideration of the recent Office for Human Research Protections decision about informed consent in SUPPORT. To the Editor: We are a group of scholars and leaders in bioethics and pediatrics with extensive experience in ethical and regulator...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The New England journal of medicine 2013-06, Vol.368 (25), p.e36-e36 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | A group of medical ethicists and pediatricians asks for reconsideration of the recent Office for Human Research Protections decision about informed consent in SUPPORT.
To the Editor:
We are a group of scholars and leaders in bioethics and pediatrics with extensive experience in ethical and regulatory issues in pediatrics and human subjects research. We urge the Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP) to withdraw its notification to the institutions involved in the Surfactant, Positive Pressure, and Oxygenation Randomized Trial (SUPPORT) that they failed to meet regulatory informed-consent requirements, in particular regarding reasonably foreseeable risks of enrollment in the study. We believe that this conclusion was a substantive error and will have adverse implications for future research.
SUPPORT was undertaken, in part, because neonatologists lacked . . . |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0028-4793 1533-4406 |
DOI: | 10.1056/NEJMc1307008 |