Topical tacrolimus for the management of acute allergic conjunctivitis in a mouse model
Background Acute allergic conjunctivitis is a constantly challenging condition that often requires steroids for effective management. Alternative treatment options are needed due to the potential side effects of steroids. Tacrolimus has been used for vernal/atopic conjunctivitis. The aim of our stud...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology 2013-07, Vol.251 (7), p.1717-1721 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
Acute allergic conjunctivitis is a constantly challenging condition that often requires steroids for effective management. Alternative treatment options are needed due to the potential side effects of steroids. Tacrolimus has been used for vernal/atopic conjunctivitis. The aim of our study was to investigate the therapeutic effect of topical administration of 0.03 % tacrolimus (eye drops or ointment) in comparison to 0.1 % dexamethasone in a mouse model of acute allergic conjunctivitis.
Methods
BALB/c mice were sensitized by an intraperitoneal injection of 10 μg/0.2 ml ovalbumin (OVA) absorbed on ALUM (2.0 mg) on days 1 and 8. They were challenged by topical instillation of 2 μl of 15 % OVA (absorbed in 10 % glycerol) twice daily, on days 15–21. Treatment was administered twice daily on days 17–21. Mice were randomly assigned topical treatment groups: Group 1, 0.1 % dexamethasone drops; Group 2, 0.03 % tacrolimus drops; Group 3, 0.03 % tacrolimus ointment; Group 4 PBS drops (control). On day 22 all mice underwent clinical evaluation, blood sampling for IgE levels, and conjunctivas were removed for eosinophil counting.
Results
IgE and OVA-specific IgE levels were similar among all groups, demonstrating induction of allergic reaction in all mice. Significantly lower clinical scores were found among all treated groups as compared to controls (
P
0.05). Conjunctival eosinophil counts were significantly lower in Group 1 (
P
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 0721-832X 1435-702X |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00417-013-2333-4 |