Comparison of results from a randomized trial 1 year after laparoscopic Nissen and Toupet fundoplications
Background The fundoplication of choice for the surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) still is debated. Multichannel intraluminal impedance monitoring (MII) has not been used to compare objective data, and comparative subjective data on laparoscopic Nissen and Toupet fundoplic...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Surgical endoscopy 2013-07, Vol.27 (7), p.2383-2390 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
The fundoplication of choice for the surgical treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) still is debated. Multichannel intraluminal impedance monitoring (MII) has not been used to compare objective data, and comparative subjective data on laparoscopic Nissen and Toupet fundoplications are scarce.
Methods
This study randomly allocated 125 patients with documented chronic GERD to either laparoscopic floppy Nissen fundoplication (LNF;
n
= 62) or laparoscopic Toupet fundoplication (LTF;
n
= 63). The Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI), symptom grading, esophageal manometry, and MII data were documented preoperatively and 1 year after surgery. The pre- and postprocedure data were compared. Statistical significance was set at a
p
value lower than 0.01 (NCT01321294).
Results
Both procedures resulted in significantly improved GIQLI and GERD symptoms. Preoperative dysphagia improved in both groups, but the improvement reached significance only in the LTF group. The ability to belch was shown to be significantly more decreased after LNF than after LTF. Gas-bloat and “atypical” extraesophageal symptoms also were decreased after surgery (
p
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 0930-2794 1432-2218 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00464-013-2803-0 |