The effect of transversus abdominis plane block or local anaesthetic infiltration in inguinal hernia repair: A randomised clinical trial
CONTEXTThe analgesic effect of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block after inguinal hernia repair is unclear. OBJECTIVEThe aim of this randomised and double-blind study was to evaluate the analgesic effect of a TAP block in patients scheduled for primary inguinal hernia repair. The TAP block was e...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | European journal of anaesthesiology 2013-07, Vol.30 (7), p.415-421 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | CONTEXTThe analgesic effect of transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block after inguinal hernia repair is unclear.
OBJECTIVEThe aim of this randomised and double-blind study was to evaluate the analgesic effect of a TAP block in patients scheduled for primary inguinal hernia repair. The TAP block was evaluated versus placebo and versus an active comparator (ilioinguinal block and wound infiltration).
DESIGNRandomised controlled trial.
SETTINGSingle centre trial. Study period from June 2010 to November 2011.
PATIENTSAdults (18 to 75 years) with American Society of Anesthesiologists’ status 1–3 scheduled for primary inguinal hernia repair as day case surgery were included in the study.
INTERVENTIONSNinety patients were allocated to one of three groupsgroup TAP, group infiltration (ilioinguinal nerve block and wound infiltration) and group placebo.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURESThe primary outcome measure was pain scores while coughing between group TAP and group placebo calculated as area under the curve for the first 24 h (AUC24 h). Secondary outcomes were pain scores while coughing and at rest, opioid consumption and side effects in groups TAP, infiltration and placebo.
RESULTSVisual analogue pain scores while coughing and at rest demonstrated no difference between groups. Pain scores in groups infiltration, TAP and placebo were 19 versus 22 versus 15 mm at rest (P = 1.00) and 37 versus 41 versus 37 mm while coughing (P = 1.00). Pain scores at 6 h (AUC6 h) were significantly lower in group infiltration than in group TAP (10 versus 25 mm at rest, P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0265-0215 1365-2346 |
DOI: | 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32835fc86f |