Robot-assisted Partial Nephrectomy for Hilar Tumors: Perioperative Outcomes

Objective To compare perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) for hilar vs nonhilar tumors. Materials and Methods The study retrospectively reviewed 364 patients with available computed tomography scans undergoing RAPN. Demographic data and perioperative outcomes results w...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Urology (Ridgewood, N.J.) N.J.), 2013-06, Vol.81 (6), p.1246-1252
Hauptverfasser: Eyraud, Rémi, Long, Jean-Alexandre, Snow-Lisy, Devon, Autorino, Riccardo, Hillyer, Shahab, Klink, Joseph, Rizkala, Emad, Stein, Robert J, Kaouk, Jihad H, Haber, Georges-Pascal
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective To compare perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) for hilar vs nonhilar tumors. Materials and Methods The study retrospectively reviewed 364 patients with available computed tomography scans undergoing RAPN. Demographic data and perioperative outcomes results were compared between the hilar (group 1, n = 70) and nonhilar tumors (group 2, n = 294). Multivariate analysis was used to identify predictors of warm ischemia time (WIT), estimated blood loss (EBL), major perioperative complications, and postoperative renal function. Results There were no differences with respect to demographic variables. Hilar tumors had higher RENAL (radius, exophytic/endophytic properties of the tumor, nearness of tumor deepest portion to the collecting system or sinus, anterior/posterior descriptor and the location relative to polar lines) scores ( P  
ISSN:0090-4295
1527-9995
DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2012.10.072