Benefit-cost analysis of the Stage 1 D/DBP Rule

In December 1998, the U.S. EPA promulgated the Stage 1 Disinfectant /Disinfection By-Products (1 D/DBP) Rule to minimize DBP. The rule would achieve this primarily through low-cost modifications, including enhanced coagulation and moving the point of disinfection, rather than advanced technologies....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of the American Water Resources Association 1999-01, Vol.91 (4), p.137-147
Hauptverfasser: Odom, R, Regli, S, Messner, M, Cromwell, J, Javdan, M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:In December 1998, the U.S. EPA promulgated the Stage 1 Disinfectant /Disinfection By-Products (1 D/DBP) Rule to minimize DBP. The rule would achieve this primarily through low-cost modifications, including enhanced coagulation and moving the point of disinfection, rather than advanced technologies. Although the D/DBP Rule would cost about 700 million U.S. dollars to implement, its benefits would be worth more. Human exposure to DBP was likely to fall 24 per cent, with a projected fall in bladder cancer probably worth 4 billion U.S. dollars. The rule's benefits and costs were analysed by 5 approaches: an overlap analysis of costs and benefits; a break-even analysis of how much bladder cancer risk would have to be reduced for the rule to pay for itself; the cost of compliance for each household; a calculation of annual net benefits from an evaluation of rule cost, exposure reduction and attributable bladder cancer risk; and an analysis of the maximal financial consequences if the supporting assumptions were wrong. Health risk uncertainties made the derivation of definitive answers difficult.
ISSN:1093-474X