Meta-analysis methods for genome-wide association studies and beyond
Key Points Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies has contributed to the discovery of most of the recently identified genetic risk factors for complex diseases. Common meta-analytical approaches have been successfully applied; however, novel methods have been proposed that may have some ad...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Nature reviews. Genetics 2013-06, Vol.14 (6), p.379-389 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Key Points
Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies has contributed to the discovery of most of the recently identified genetic risk factors for complex diseases.
Common meta-analytical approaches have been successfully applied; however, novel methods have been proposed that may have some advantages and disadvantages.
Heterogeneity in meta-analysis can be introduced from various sources and should not be disregarded. Several methods have been proposed that may optimize power in the presence of heterogeneity from known or unknown sources.
Next-generation sequence data will boost the study of rare variants; however, larger sample sizes are required. Several techniques have been developed for the meta-analysis of rare variants. Tools other than
P
values may be useful for inference.
Scientists will benefit from publicly available data sets and collaboration between consortia that will facilitate a wide range of methodological and applied research.
The authors review statistical methods for meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies (GWASs) and extensions of these methods to complex data. They discuss how low-frequency variants can be incorporated into meta-analyses as next-generation sequencing data become more commonly used in GWASs.
Meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies (GWASs) has become a popular method for discovering genetic risk variants. Here, we overview both widely applied and newer statistical methods for GWAS meta-analysis, including issues of interpretation and assessment of sources of heterogeneity. We also discuss extensions of these meta-analysis methods to complex data. Where possible, we provide guidelines for researchers who are planning to use these methods. Furthermore, we address special issues that may arise for meta-analysis of sequencing data and rare variants. Finally, we discuss challenges and solutions surrounding the goals of making meta-analysis data publicly available and building powerful consortia. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1471-0056 1471-0064 |
DOI: | 10.1038/nrg3472 |