Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate versus transurethral resection of the prostate: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) versus transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for relief of bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) on benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). A systematic literature search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs)...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of endourology 2013-05, Vol.27 (5), p.604-611
Hauptverfasser: Yin, Lei, Teng, Jingfei, Huang, Chien-Jung, Zhang, Xiangmin, Xu, Danfeng
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To evaluate the efficacy and safety of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) versus transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for relief of bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) on benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). A systematic literature search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing HoLEP and TURP in several databases from 1996 to 2011 were performed. Meta-analysis was conducted with the Review Manager Software. Of 248 potential citations, 6 RCTs were included into our meta-analysis. There was no significant difference between the two groups in the maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax) and international prostate symptom score (IPSS) at 1 month (p=0.41 and p=0.87) or 6 months (p=0.07 and p=0.37) after treatment. However, at 12 months postoperatively, the Qmax and IPSS in the HoLEP group were significantly better than those in the TURP group (p
ISSN:0892-7790
1557-900X
DOI:10.1089/end.2012.0505