Psychological reactions related to fetal magnetic resonance imaging: a follow-up study

To assess the women’s retrospective perception of fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Thirty-six women were investigated 1 year after fetal MRI. Data was acquired by telephone interviews and standardised rating scales (i.e., Postscan Imaging Distress Questionnaire, mood and anxiety scales). In r...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of perinatal medicine 2013-05, Vol.41 (3), p.273-276
Hauptverfasser: Leithner, Katharina, Prayer, Daniela, Porstner, Eva, Kapusta, Nestor D., Stammler-Safar, Maria, Krampl-Bettelheim, Elisabeth, Hilger, Eva
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:To assess the women’s retrospective perception of fetal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Thirty-six women were investigated 1 year after fetal MRI. Data was acquired by telephone interviews and standardised rating scales (i.e., Postscan Imaging Distress Questionnaire, mood and anxiety scales). In retrospect, most women felt that fetal MRI was associated with marked psychological distress, notably with significant greater distress than at the time of the actual investigation. In total, 55.6% of the women rated at least one aspect of fetal MRI as “not tolerable” at follow-up. These findings were irrespective of the affective status and of the outcome of the pregnancy. Yet, MRI was rated as “the most important” investigation during the prenatal period by 69.4% of subjects, and 80.6% felt that they had sufficiently been informed about the MRI findings. The acceptance of fetal MRI was found to be very high; however, fetal MRI is linked with marked psychological distress, which was still present – and in many cases even stronger – 1 year after the investigation. These data highlight the importance of sufficient information about fetal MRI and the necessity of adequate emotional support in this emotional vulnerable patient sample.
ISSN:0300-5577
1619-3997
DOI:10.1515/jpm-2012-0218