Effect of High- and Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Visuospatial Neglect in Patients With Acute Stroke: A Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Trial
Abstract Objective To compare the therapeutic effect of low- and high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) in patients with acute stroke with visuospatial neglect. Design This study was a prospective, double-blind, sham-controlled trial...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 2013-05, Vol.94 (5), p.803-807 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Abstract Objective To compare the therapeutic effect of low- and high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) in patients with acute stroke with visuospatial neglect. Design This study was a prospective, double-blind, sham-controlled trial. Data are presented from 27 patients (15 men, 12 women; mean age, 67.0y) randomly assigned to receive 10 sessions of low-frequency (1Hz) rTMS over the nonlesioned PPC, high-frequency (10Hz) rTMS over the lesioned PPC, or sham stimulation. Setting National university hospital. Participants Patients (N=27) diagnosed with visuospatial neglect after stroke. Intervention Ten sessions of rTMS over a 2-week period. Main Outcome Measures The severity of visuospatial neglect was assessed pre- and posttreatment using the Motor-Free Visual Perception Test, line bisection test, star cancellation test, and Catherine Bergego Scale. Results When comparing the differences in the Motor-Free Visual Perception Test, line bisection test, star cancellation test, Catherine Bergego Scale, and Korean-Modified Barthel Index (K-MBI) scores before and after treatment according to group, we found that changes in the line bisection test and K-MBI scores were significantly different between 3 groups. In the post hoc analysis, the improvement in the line bisection test score in the high-frequency rTMS group was statistically significant compared with that in the sham stimulation group (high vs sham P =.03, low vs sham P =.09, high vs low P =.58), and the improvements in the K-MBI scores of the 2 rTMS groups were statistically significant compared with those in the sham stimulation group (high vs sham P |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0003-9993 1532-821X |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.12.016 |