Locating the normative within economic science: towards the analysis of hidden discourses of democracy in international politics

Economic science has been overwhelmingly perceived as a ‘positive’ science, both among economists and many scholars in other social sciences. As a result, there has been an estrangement between the ‘scientific’ study of economics and the study of ‘fuzzier’ matters of normative nature. Crucially, it...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of international relations and development 2013-01, Vol.16 (1), p.55-81
1. Verfasser: Kurki, Milja
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Economic science has been overwhelmingly perceived as a ‘positive’ science, both among economists and many scholars in other social sciences. As a result, there has been an estrangement between the ‘scientific’ study of economics and the study of ‘fuzzier’ matters of normative nature. Crucially, it is often assumed that economists — whether academics or practitioners — have little to say about democracy, a concept that is famously normative and contested in nature. This article argues that this perception is mistaken and misleading. When several key figures in economic science are examined in detail, we can see that their economic theories are, in fact, deeply intertwined with certain normative visions of democracy, even if implicitly. Recognising the role of hidden normative theories of democracy within economic science perspectives is important theoretically, in re-reading the nature and scope of economic science discourses. It is also, however, important in understanding some key world political trends. It is argued here that we are in a better position to understand the curious ‘dabbling’ of global financial organisations in matters of ‘political nature’ when we remain attuned to the role of hidden democratic assumptions. Also, the complex role of these organisations in ‘democracy promotion’, and the nature of democracy promotion itself, can thus be better appreciated.
ISSN:1408-6980
1581-1980
DOI:10.1057/jird.2012.8