Clinical use of alumina-toughened zirconia abutments for implant-supported restoration: prospective cohort study of survival analysis

Objectives The aim of this prospective cohort study was to compute the long‐term clinical survival and complication rates of alumina‐toughened zirconia abutments used for implant‐supported restorations and to evaluate the effects of several clinical variables on these rates. Material and methods Fro...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical oral implants research 2013-05, Vol.24 (5), p.517-522
Hauptverfasser: Kim, Seung-Soo, Yeo, In-Sung, Lee, Shin-Jae, Kim, Dae-Joon, Jang, Brian Myeongwoo, Kim, Soo-Hwan, Han, Jung-Suk
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives The aim of this prospective cohort study was to compute the long‐term clinical survival and complication rates of alumina‐toughened zirconia abutments used for implant‐supported restorations and to evaluate the effects of several clinical variables on these rates. Material and methods From May 1998 to September 2010, 213 patients aged 18 years or older were recruited. The patients received 611 external hex implants and 328 implant‐supported fixed restorations using alumina‐toughened zirconia abutments. During the follow‐up, each restoration was coded as a dental event, which included loosening or fracture of abutment screws, and abutment fracture. From the coded data, the effects of the investigated clinical variables—restored area (anterior/posterior), number of prosthodontic units (one/two units or over), prosthesis type (single‐unit/multiunit without pontic/multiunit with pontic), implant system, and patient gender—on the survival of the abutments were evaluated. Survival analysis using Kaplan–Meier method and Cox proportional hazard model was applied. The 5‐year survival and complication rates of the abutments were assessed. Results The number of prosthodontic units and the type of prosthesis had a significant association with complication rates (P 
ISSN:0905-7161
1600-0501
DOI:10.1111/j.1600-0501.2011.02413.x