Evaluations of an in-house drug resistance method for HIV-1 drug resistance using ViroSeq™ 2.0 genotyping system as a gold standard

[Display omitted] ► We have developed and evaluated an in-house HIV drug resistance testing/genotyping method. ► Sequencing of protease and RT regions of HIV-1 pol gene was carried by both the in-house and the Viroseq methods. ► Comparison of the in-house HIV drug resistance testing results with tha...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of virological methods 2013-04, Vol.189 (1), p.87-92
Hauptverfasser: Chaturbhuj, Devidas N., Deshmukh, Pravin S., Hingankar, Nitin K., Siddhaarth, K., Deshpande, Sohan N., Sen, Sourav, Kabra, Sandhya, Paranjape, Ramesh S., Tripathy, Srikanth P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:[Display omitted] ► We have developed and evaluated an in-house HIV drug resistance testing/genotyping method. ► Sequencing of protease and RT regions of HIV-1 pol gene was carried by both the in-house and the Viroseq methods. ► Comparison of the in-house HIV drug resistance testing results with that obtained with that obtained with the Viroseq assay has been presented in this manuscript. An in-house method was evaluated for its efficiency to detect the HIV-1 drug resistance mutations. This method was compared with the ViroSeq™ Genotyping System 2.0 (Celera Diagnostics, US) a gold standard. Sixty-five stored plasma samples, previously tested for HIV-1 drug resistance using the ViroSeq™ method were used to evaluate the in-house method. Out of the sixty five plasma samples, sixty were HIV-1 positive clinical samples; four samples from the Virology Quality Assessment (VQA) program and one positive control from the ViroSeq™ kit were used in this study. The sequences generated by the ViroSeq™ and an in-house method showed 99.5±0.5% and 99.7±0.4% (mean±SD) nucleotide and amino acid identity, respectively. Out of 214 Stanford HIVdb listed HIV-1 drug resistance mutations in the protease and reverse transcriptase regions, concordance was observed in 203 (94.9%), partial discordance in 11 (5.1%) and complete discordance was absent. The in-house primers are broadly sensitive in genotyping multiple HIV-1 group M subtypes. The amplification sensitivity of the in-house method was 1000 copies/ml. The evaluation of the in-house method provides results comparable with that of ViroSeq™ method thus, making the in-house method suitable for HIV-1 drug resistance testing in the developing countries.
ISSN:0166-0934
1879-0984
DOI:10.1016/j.jviromet.2013.01.001