A Comparison Between Phragmites australis and Helianthus annuus in Chromium Phytoextraction
A comparison of chromium abatement from irrigation water, by the use of two selected plant species, Phragmites australis and Helianthus annuus , planted in chromium-contaminated soil, was studied in the present work. The above plant species were irrigated, in a continuous mode, with 10 mg Cr VI /L c...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Water, air, and soil pollution air, and soil pollution, 2013-03, Vol.224 (3), p.1-9, Article 1465 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | A comparison of chromium abatement from irrigation water, by the use of two selected plant species,
Phragmites australis
and
Helianthus annuus
, planted in chromium-contaminated soil, was studied in the present work. The above plant species were irrigated, in a continuous mode, with 10 mg Cr
VI
/L contaminated tap water. More than 90 % of hexavalent chromium was reduced to trivalent chromium, from both plant species, as measured in the drainage water. Moreover, total chromium removal ranged from 54 % (
Phragmites
) to 70 % (
Helianthus
). After 90 days, the total chromium content of the contaminated soil dropped from 70 to 32 and 34 mg Cr/kg
dry soil
, for
Helianthus
and
Phragmites
, respectively.
Helianthus
accumulated higher amount of chromium in the roots (2,730 mg Cr/kg
dry tissue
) as compared to 1,800 mg Cr/kg
dry tissue
for
Phragmites
. Most of Cr
VI
was reduced to Cr
III
in all plant tissues, with
Phragmites
showing lower affinity for Cr
VI
reduction in the root tissues but higher chromium translocation potential from roots to stems, while
Helianthus
showed higher chromium translocation from roots to leaves. Toxicity effects, expressed as root growth rate inhibition, indicated that
Phragmites
were the most tolerant specie to chromium effects. Both plant species showed high potentialities to be used in phytoremediation installations for chromium removal. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0049-6979 1573-2932 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11270-013-1465-9 |