Commentary: liberalisation, art, and funding

Explores arguments surrounding state funding of the arts focusing on the critical response to Ronald Dworkin's publication A Matter of Principle (Cambridge, M.A.: Harvard University Press, 1985). The author examines Harry Brighouse's argument that state support violates state neutrality, h...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of aesthetic education 2004-09, Vol.38 (3), p.116-122
1. Verfasser: Murray, Dale Francis
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 122
container_issue 3
container_start_page 116
container_title The Journal of aesthetic education
container_volume 38
creator Murray, Dale Francis
description Explores arguments surrounding state funding of the arts focusing on the critical response to Ronald Dworkin's publication A Matter of Principle (Cambridge, M.A.: Harvard University Press, 1985). The author examines Harry Brighouse's argument that state support violates state neutrality, highlights the differences between moral and aesthetic values in relation to state funding, and discusses Dworkin's arguments. He considers the role of market forces in funding art, argues that the private sector cannot support innovation, and concludes by justifying state funding of the arts.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1320225777</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1320225777</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_13202257773</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYeA0MDAy1LUwNTTgYOAqLs4yMDA0NTex5GTQcc7PzU3NK0ksqrRSyMlMSi1KzMksTizJzM_TUUgsKgESeSkKaaV5KZl56TwMrGmJOcWpvFCam0HDzTXE2UO3oCi_sDS1uCQ-N7M4OTUnJzEvNb-0ON7Q2MjAyMjU3NzcmASlADibNNo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1320225777</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Commentary: liberalisation, art, and funding</title><source>ARTbibliographies Modern</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Murray, Dale Francis</creator><creatorcontrib>Murray, Dale Francis</creatorcontrib><description>Explores arguments surrounding state funding of the arts focusing on the critical response to Ronald Dworkin's publication A Matter of Principle (Cambridge, M.A.: Harvard University Press, 1985). The author examines Harry Brighouse's argument that state support violates state neutrality, highlights the differences between moral and aesthetic values in relation to state funding, and discusses Dworkin's arguments. He considers the role of market forces in funding art, argues that the private sector cannot support innovation, and concludes by justifying state funding of the arts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8510</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>The Journal of aesthetic education, 2004-09, Vol.38 (3), p.116-122</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,30993</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Murray, Dale Francis</creatorcontrib><title>Commentary: liberalisation, art, and funding</title><title>The Journal of aesthetic education</title><description>Explores arguments surrounding state funding of the arts focusing on the critical response to Ronald Dworkin's publication A Matter of Principle (Cambridge, M.A.: Harvard University Press, 1985). The author examines Harry Brighouse's argument that state support violates state neutrality, highlights the differences between moral and aesthetic values in relation to state funding, and discusses Dworkin's arguments. He considers the role of market forces in funding art, argues that the private sector cannot support innovation, and concludes by justifying state funding of the arts.</description><issn>0021-8510</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QI</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYeA0MDAy1LUwNTTgYOAqLs4yMDA0NTex5GTQcc7PzU3NK0ksqrRSyMlMSi1KzMksTizJzM_TUUgsKgESeSkKaaV5KZl56TwMrGmJOcWpvFCam0HDzTXE2UO3oCi_sDS1uCQ-N7M4OTUnJzEvNb-0ON7Q2MjAyMjU3NzcmASlADibNNo</recordid><startdate>20040901</startdate><enddate>20040901</enddate><creator>Murray, Dale Francis</creator><scope>7QI</scope><scope>~I4</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040901</creationdate><title>Commentary: liberalisation, art, and funding</title><author>Murray, Dale Francis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_13202257773</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Murray, Dale Francis</creatorcontrib><collection>ARTbibliographies Modern</collection><collection>ARTbibliographies Modern (ABM) for DFG</collection><jtitle>The Journal of aesthetic education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Murray, Dale Francis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Commentary: liberalisation, art, and funding</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of aesthetic education</jtitle><date>2004-09-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>116</spage><epage>122</epage><pages>116-122</pages><issn>0021-8510</issn><abstract>Explores arguments surrounding state funding of the arts focusing on the critical response to Ronald Dworkin's publication A Matter of Principle (Cambridge, M.A.: Harvard University Press, 1985). The author examines Harry Brighouse's argument that state support violates state neutrality, highlights the differences between moral and aesthetic values in relation to state funding, and discusses Dworkin's arguments. He considers the role of market forces in funding art, argues that the private sector cannot support innovation, and concludes by justifying state funding of the arts.</abstract></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8510
ispartof The Journal of aesthetic education, 2004-09, Vol.38 (3), p.116-122
issn 0021-8510
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1320225777
source ARTbibliographies Modern; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
title Commentary: liberalisation, art, and funding
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T15%3A51%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Commentary:%20liberalisation,%20art,%20and%20funding&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20aesthetic%20education&rft.au=Murray,%20Dale%20Francis&rft.date=2004-09-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=116&rft.epage=122&rft.pages=116-122&rft.issn=0021-8510&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1320225777%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1320225777&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true