Commentary: liberalisation, art, and funding
Explores arguments surrounding state funding of the arts focusing on the critical response to Ronald Dworkin's publication A Matter of Principle (Cambridge, M.A.: Harvard University Press, 1985). The author examines Harry Brighouse's argument that state support violates state neutrality, h...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of aesthetic education 2004-09, Vol.38 (3), p.116-122 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 122 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 116 |
container_title | The Journal of aesthetic education |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | Murray, Dale Francis |
description | Explores arguments surrounding state funding of the arts focusing on the critical response to Ronald Dworkin's publication A Matter of Principle (Cambridge, M.A.: Harvard University Press, 1985). The author examines Harry Brighouse's argument that state support violates state neutrality, highlights the differences between moral and aesthetic values in relation to state funding, and discusses Dworkin's arguments. He considers the role of market forces in funding art, argues that the private sector cannot support innovation, and concludes by justifying state funding of the arts. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1320225777</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1320225777</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_13202257773</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYeA0MDAy1LUwNTTgYOAqLs4yMDA0NTex5GTQcc7PzU3NK0ksqrRSyMlMSi1KzMksTizJzM_TUUgsKgESeSkKaaV5KZl56TwMrGmJOcWpvFCam0HDzTXE2UO3oCi_sDS1uCQ-N7M4OTUnJzEvNb-0ON7Q2MjAyMjU3NzcmASlADibNNo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1320225777</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Commentary: liberalisation, art, and funding</title><source>ARTbibliographies Modern</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Murray, Dale Francis</creator><creatorcontrib>Murray, Dale Francis</creatorcontrib><description>Explores arguments surrounding state funding of the arts focusing on the critical response to Ronald Dworkin's publication A Matter of Principle (Cambridge, M.A.: Harvard University Press, 1985). The author examines Harry Brighouse's argument that state support violates state neutrality, highlights the differences between moral and aesthetic values in relation to state funding, and discusses Dworkin's arguments. He considers the role of market forces in funding art, argues that the private sector cannot support innovation, and concludes by justifying state funding of the arts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8510</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>The Journal of aesthetic education, 2004-09, Vol.38 (3), p.116-122</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,30993</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Murray, Dale Francis</creatorcontrib><title>Commentary: liberalisation, art, and funding</title><title>The Journal of aesthetic education</title><description>Explores arguments surrounding state funding of the arts focusing on the critical response to Ronald Dworkin's publication A Matter of Principle (Cambridge, M.A.: Harvard University Press, 1985). The author examines Harry Brighouse's argument that state support violates state neutrality, highlights the differences between moral and aesthetic values in relation to state funding, and discusses Dworkin's arguments. He considers the role of market forces in funding art, argues that the private sector cannot support innovation, and concludes by justifying state funding of the arts.</description><issn>0021-8510</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QI</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYeA0MDAy1LUwNTTgYOAqLs4yMDA0NTex5GTQcc7PzU3NK0ksqrRSyMlMSi1KzMksTizJzM_TUUgsKgESeSkKaaV5KZl56TwMrGmJOcWpvFCam0HDzTXE2UO3oCi_sDS1uCQ-N7M4OTUnJzEvNb-0ON7Q2MjAyMjU3NzcmASlADibNNo</recordid><startdate>20040901</startdate><enddate>20040901</enddate><creator>Murray, Dale Francis</creator><scope>7QI</scope><scope>~I4</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20040901</creationdate><title>Commentary: liberalisation, art, and funding</title><author>Murray, Dale Francis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_13202257773</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Murray, Dale Francis</creatorcontrib><collection>ARTbibliographies Modern</collection><collection>ARTbibliographies Modern (ABM) for DFG</collection><jtitle>The Journal of aesthetic education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Murray, Dale Francis</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Commentary: liberalisation, art, and funding</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of aesthetic education</jtitle><date>2004-09-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>116</spage><epage>122</epage><pages>116-122</pages><issn>0021-8510</issn><abstract>Explores arguments surrounding state funding of the arts focusing on the critical response to Ronald Dworkin's publication A Matter of Principle (Cambridge, M.A.: Harvard University Press, 1985). The author examines Harry Brighouse's argument that state support violates state neutrality, highlights the differences between moral and aesthetic values in relation to state funding, and discusses Dworkin's arguments. He considers the role of market forces in funding art, argues that the private sector cannot support innovation, and concludes by justifying state funding of the arts.</abstract></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0021-8510 |
ispartof | The Journal of aesthetic education, 2004-09, Vol.38 (3), p.116-122 |
issn | 0021-8510 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1320225777 |
source | ARTbibliographies Modern; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing |
title | Commentary: liberalisation, art, and funding |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T15%3A51%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Commentary:%20liberalisation,%20art,%20and%20funding&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20aesthetic%20education&rft.au=Murray,%20Dale%20Francis&rft.date=2004-09-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=116&rft.epage=122&rft.pages=116-122&rft.issn=0021-8510&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E1320225777%3C/proquest%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1320225777&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |