Commentary: liberalisation, art, and funding
Explores arguments surrounding state funding of the arts focusing on the critical response to Ronald Dworkin's publication A Matter of Principle (Cambridge, M.A.: Harvard University Press, 1985). The author examines Harry Brighouse's argument that state support violates state neutrality, h...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of aesthetic education 2004-09, Vol.38 (3), p.116-122 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Explores arguments surrounding state funding of the arts focusing on the critical response to Ronald Dworkin's publication A Matter of Principle (Cambridge, M.A.: Harvard University Press, 1985). The author examines Harry Brighouse's argument that state support violates state neutrality, highlights the differences between moral and aesthetic values in relation to state funding, and discusses Dworkin's arguments. He considers the role of market forces in funding art, argues that the private sector cannot support innovation, and concludes by justifying state funding of the arts. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0021-8510 |