Nasal asymmetry in unilateral cleft lip and palate

Summary Objectives Comparison of nasal asymmetry between unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) patients with and without nasal correction at primary repair. Assessment of the value of Symnose as a routine research tool. Participants 75 ten-year-old UCLP patients who underwent primary lip repair by one of two techniques: classical Millard with primary nasal correction ( n = 30) or modified Millard without nasal correction ( n = 45). Control group of ten-year-old school children ( n = 45). Methods Nasal asymmetry of participants was measured from facial photographs taken in two views: frontal and basal. The Symnose computer program was used to calculate asymmetry for three parameters: front perimeter (FP), base perimeter (BP) and nostrils ( N ). Total asymmetry was also calculated. Each image was traced on three separate occasions and a mean of the three measurements was calculated. Results BP, N and total asymmetry were significantly greater in UCLP patients without nasal correction compared to both controls and patients with correction (BP = 12.73% v 4.90% v 6.75%, N = 47.73% v 15.83% v 30.75%, total = 81.87% v 46.43% v 54.68%, p ≤ 0.001). FP asymmetry was significantly greater in controls than all UCLP patients (22.87% v. 18.18% and 15.07%, p = 0.001 and p = 0.008). BP measurements have a higher degree of repeatability than FP and N (Coefficient of repeatability = 5.99, 17.02 and 16.47, respectively). Conclusions Primary nasal correction produces greater nasal symmetry during childhood from the basal view. Symnose is a simple method of objectively measuring asymmetry in UCLP, however improvements are required before it can be considered a useful research tool.