Motor strategies and motor programs during an arm tapping task in adults with Down Syndrome

Slow movements and atypical patterns of muscle activation are well-known features of Down Syndrome (DS). Some studies attribute these features to a deficit in voluntary motor commands and preprogramming of actions, that lead subjects with DS to be more reliant on feedback control. In the present stu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Experimental brain research 2013-03, Vol.225 (3), p.333-338
Hauptverfasser: Vimercati, Sara Laura, Galli, Manuela, Rigoldi, Chiara, Ancillao, Andrea, Albertini, Giorgio
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Slow movements and atypical patterns of muscle activation are well-known features of Down Syndrome (DS). Some studies attribute these features to a deficit in voluntary motor commands and preprogramming of actions, that lead subjects with DS to be more reliant on feedback control. In the present study, we evaluated the movement strategies of 13 adult subjects with DS and of 22 age-matched controls ( N ) during an arm tapping task. By means of quantitative motion analysis, our aim was to describe movement differences in DS respect to typical population and provide a means of interpreting such differences in terms of the underlying different control processes. The results highlighted distinct motor strategies for the tapping task in the two groups, with DS relying more on the trunk motion and N relying on the elbow motion to accomplish the task. Furthermore, DS corrected their wrist trajectory more than N subjects, giving shape to multi-peaked velocity profiles. Longer duration of the trials and a higher index of curvature were found in DS. The results suggest that subjects with DS rely more on feedback control, whereas they have problems with movement planning and feed-forward control. The different strategy operated by subjects with DS leads to a different task performance.
ISSN:0014-4819
1432-1106
DOI:10.1007/s00221-012-3373-4