Determining research priorities for clinician‐initiated trials in infectious diseases

Objectives: To determine research priorities of infectious diseases physicians for clinician‐initiated randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Design, setting and participants: Online survey of infectious diseases physicians in Australia and New Zealand. Main outcome measures: Research priorities for,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical journal of Australia 2013-03, Vol.198 (5), p.270-272
1. Verfasser: Paterson, David L
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives: To determine research priorities of infectious diseases physicians for clinician‐initiated randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Design, setting and participants: Online survey of infectious diseases physicians in Australia and New Zealand. Main outcome measures: Research priorities for, and perceived barriers to, clinician‐initiated RCTs. Results: 122/550 infectious diseases physicians (22%) responded to the survey. The five highest ranked proposals for clinician‐initiated RCTs were in the areas of prosthetic joint infections, septic arthritis and osteomyelitis of native joints, Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections, diabetic foot infections and the treatment of serious multiresistant, gram‐negative bacterial infections. Lack of funding was the most important perceived barrier to participation in clinician‐initiated RCTs. Conclusions: The research focus of infectious diseases physicians — optimal treatment of commonly encountered serious infections — highlights a lack of well conducted RCTs in this area.
ISSN:0025-729X
1326-5377
DOI:10.5694/mja12.11703