Automated, semi-automated, and manual analyses of anti-cardiolipin and anti-β2-glycoprotein I antibodies in women with a history of miscarriage

Summary Introduction Anti‐cardiolipin and β2‐glycoprotein I antibodies represent important diagnostic parameters in routine hematology. In this study, five different automated, semi‐automated, and manual immunoassays detecting IgG/IgM anti‐cardiolipin and anti‐β2‐glycoprotein I antibodies were teste...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of laboratory hematology 2013-04, Vol.35 (2), p.150-162
Hauptverfasser: Gutensohn, K., Vossen, D., Strate, A., Kersten, J. F., Hofbauer, M., Krieger, T.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Summary Introduction Anti‐cardiolipin and β2‐glycoprotein I antibodies represent important diagnostic parameters in routine hematology. In this study, five different automated, semi‐automated, and manual immunoassays detecting IgG/IgM anti‐cardiolipin and anti‐β2‐glycoprotein I antibodies were tested. Methods A total of 162 samples from women with a history of miscarriage were recruited from 110 different G&O outpatient centers in Germany. Results For both anti‐cardiolipin and anti‐β2‐glycoprotein I antibodies, considerable differences in the percentage of positive results were seen between all five methods, and itemization of all positive test results revealed a poor accordance. These findings were confirmed by Cohen's kappa coefficients. Conclusion Our study revealed a moderate to poor accordance between five different test systems for anti‐cardiolipin and anti‐β2‐glycoprotein I antibodies. Such deviations may result in clinical misinterpretation of data and may lead to wrong therapeutic consequences. Therefore, further standardization of all tests for anti‐phospholipid antibodies should be achieved.
ISSN:1751-5521
1751-553X
DOI:10.1111/ijlh.12011