Automated, semi-automated, and manual analyses of anti-cardiolipin and anti-β2-glycoprotein I antibodies in women with a history of miscarriage
Summary Introduction Anti‐cardiolipin and β2‐glycoprotein I antibodies represent important diagnostic parameters in routine hematology. In this study, five different automated, semi‐automated, and manual immunoassays detecting IgG/IgM anti‐cardiolipin and anti‐β2‐glycoprotein I antibodies were teste...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of laboratory hematology 2013-04, Vol.35 (2), p.150-162 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Summary
Introduction
Anti‐cardiolipin and β2‐glycoprotein I antibodies represent important diagnostic parameters in routine hematology. In this study, five different automated, semi‐automated, and manual immunoassays detecting IgG/IgM anti‐cardiolipin and anti‐β2‐glycoprotein I antibodies were tested.
Methods
A total of 162 samples from women with a history of miscarriage were recruited from 110 different G&O outpatient centers in Germany.
Results
For both anti‐cardiolipin and anti‐β2‐glycoprotein I antibodies, considerable differences in the percentage of positive results were seen between all five methods, and itemization of all positive test results revealed a poor accordance. These findings were confirmed by Cohen's kappa coefficients.
Conclusion
Our study revealed a moderate to poor accordance between five different test systems for anti‐cardiolipin and anti‐β2‐glycoprotein I antibodies. Such deviations may result in clinical misinterpretation of data and may lead to wrong therapeutic consequences. Therefore, further standardization of all tests for anti‐phospholipid antibodies should be achieved. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1751-5521 1751-553X |
DOI: | 10.1111/ijlh.12011 |