Radiation exposure during continuous and pulsed fluoroscopy

Abstract Background and Purpose: Previous studies using pulsed fluoroscopy have shown variable effects on radiation exposure because of the ramp and trail effect in older C-arm systems. This study compares radiation delivered in pulsed and continuous modalities using a modern C-arm system. Thermolum...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of endourology 2013-03, Vol.27 (3), p.384-388
Hauptverfasser: Smith, Damien L, Heldt, Jonathan P, Richards, Gideon D, Agarwal, Gautum, Brisbane, Wayne G, Chen, Catherine J, Chamberlin, Joshua D, Baldwin, D Duane
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Background and Purpose: Previous studies using pulsed fluoroscopy have shown variable effects on radiation exposure because of the ramp and trail effect in older C-arm systems. This study compares radiation delivered in pulsed and continuous modalities using a modern C-arm system. Thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) positioned in three body locations directly measured radiation dose during simulated ureteroscopy. Thirty pedal activations were administered using a pulsed or continuous mode to visualize an implanted guidewire and a radiopaque stone. TLD absorbed radiation and image quality were compared between imaging modes. Pulsed fluoroscopy delivered less radiation compared with continuous fluoroscopy at each site: Anterior skin (0.10 vs 0.26 mGy, P
ISSN:0892-7790
1557-900X
DOI:10.1089/end.2012.0213