Endoscopic papillary large-balloon dilation following limited sphincterotomy for the removal of refractory bile duct stones: Experience of 169 cases in a single Chinese center
Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic papillary large‐balloon dilation (EPLBD) combined with limited endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) for the removal of large biliary duct stones (≥10 mm). Methods Data of patients who underwent an attempted removal of large bile duct stones by l...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of digestive diseases 2013-03, Vol.14 (3), p.125-131 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Objective
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic papillary large‐balloon dilation (EPLBD) combined with limited endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) for the removal of large biliary duct stones (≥10 mm).
Methods
Data of patients who underwent an attempted removal of large bile duct stones by limited EST followed by EPLBD (≥12 mm in diameter) from April 2006 to October 2011 in our center were reviewed. Clinical characteristics, endoscopic methods and outcomes of the patients were collected and analyzed.
Results
A total of 169 patients with a mean age of 69.3 years (range 19–97 years) underwent 171 procedures. Median stone size and balloon diameter was 15 mm and 13 mm, respectively. Complete stone removal in a single session was achieved in 163 procedures (95.3%) with mechanical lithotripsy (ML) used in 66 (38.6%). Patients with a larger stone size required more frequent use of ML with a comparable success rate (P 0.05). Seven patients had eight procedure‐related complications including moderate or mild bleeding (n = 4), minor perforation (n = 1), mild pancreatitis (n = 2) and cholangitis (n = 1).
Conclusion
EPLBD following limited EST is an effective and safe approach for the removal of large biliary duct stones, especially for those refractory cases. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1751-2972 1751-2980 |
DOI: | 10.1111/1751-2980.12013 |