Common Hand Sanitizer May Distort Readings of Breathalyzer Tests in the Absence of Acute Intoxication

Objectives The use of alcohol‐based hand sanitizers has recently become widespread. To the authors' knowledge, no previous study has examined whether application of ethanol‐based hand sanitizers by the person operating a common breathalyzer machine will affect the accuracy of the readings. This...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Academic emergency medicine 2013-02, Vol.20 (2), p.212-215
Hauptverfasser: Ali, Syed S., Wilson, Michael P., Castillo, Edward M., Witucki, Peter, Simmons, Todd T., Vilke, Gary M., Goldstein, Joshua N.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objectives The use of alcohol‐based hand sanitizers has recently become widespread. To the authors' knowledge, no previous study has examined whether application of ethanol‐based hand sanitizers by the person operating a common breathalyzer machine will affect the accuracy of the readings. This was a prospective study investigating whether the use of hand sanitizer applied according to manufacturer's recommendations (Group I), applied improperly at standard doses (Group II), or applied improperly at high doses (Group III) had an effect on breathalyzer readings of individuals who had not ingested alcohol. Methods The participants of the prospective study were divided into three groups to assess the effect of hand sanitizer on breathalyzer readings. Group I used one pump (1.5 mL) of hand sanitizer (Purell), allowing the hands to dry per manufacturer's recommendations; Group II used one pump (1.5 mL), without allowing the hands to dry; and Group III used two pumps (3 mL), without allowing the hands to dry. Breathalyzer measures for each group are presented as medians with interquartile ranges (IQR) and ranges. Differences between each sequential group (I vs. II and II vs. III) were assessed using a Mann‐Whitney U‐test (p 
ISSN:1069-6563
1553-2712
DOI:10.1111/acem.12073