Hydroxyapatite/β-tricalcium phosphate and enamel matrix derivative for treatment of proximal class II furcation defects: a randomized clinical trial

Objective To clinically evaluate proximal furcations treated with hydroxyapatite/β‐tricalcium phosphate (HA/β‐TCP) isolated or combined with enamel matrix derivative (EMD). Material and Methods Thirty patients, presenting at least one proximal class II furcation defect, probing pocket depth (PPD) ≥5...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical periodontology 2013-03, Vol.40 (3), p.252-259
Hauptverfasser: Peres, Maria F. S., Ribeiro, Érica D. P., Casarin, Renato C. V., Ruiz, Karina G. S., Junior, Francisco H. N., Sallum, Enilson A., Casati, Márcio Z.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective To clinically evaluate proximal furcations treated with hydroxyapatite/β‐tricalcium phosphate (HA/β‐TCP) isolated or combined with enamel matrix derivative (EMD). Material and Methods Thirty patients, presenting at least one proximal class II furcation defect, probing pocket depth (PPD) ≥5 mm and bleeding on probing, were included. The defects were assigned to the HA/β‐TCP group (n = 15); open‐flap debridement (OFD) + HA/β‐TCP filling, or, HA/β‐TCP‐EMD group (n = 15); OFD + HA/β‐TCP + EMD filling. Plaque (PI) and gingival index (GI), PPD, relative gingival margin position (RGMP), vertical and horizontal attachment level (RVAL and RHAL), vertical and horizontal bone level (RVBL and RHBL), and furcation diagnosis were evaluated at baseline and at 6 months. Results Both groups presented improvements after therapies (p  0.05). At 6 months, the gains in rVCAL in the HA/β‐TCP and HA/β‐TCP‐EMD groups were 1.47 ± 0.99 and 2.10 ± 0.87 mm, while the RHCAL gains were 1.47 ± 1.46 and 1.57 ± 1.58 mm (p > 0.05). The RVBL and RHBL gains for the HA/β‐TCP and HA/β‐TCP‐EMD group were 1.47 ± 1.13 and 1.70 ± 1.26 mm, and 1.90 ± 1.11 and 1.70 ± 1.37 mm respectively (p > 0.05). The HA/β‐TCP‐EMD group showed seven closed furcations versus four in the HA/β‐TCP group (p > 0.05). Conclusion Both treatments lead to improvements in all clinical variables studied in the present trial. However, the closure of proximal class II furcation defects is still unpredictable.
ISSN:0303-6979
1600-051X
DOI:10.1111/jcpe.12054