How features of educational technology applications affect student reading outcomes: A meta-analysis

► The findings suggest that educational technology produced a positive, though small, effect. ► There were differential impacts of various types of educational technology applications. ► Traditional computer-assisted instruction programs produced a small effect. ► Applications with the support of pr...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Educational research review 2012-12, Vol.7 (3), p.198-215
Hauptverfasser: Cheung, Alan C.K., Slavin, Robert E.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:► The findings suggest that educational technology produced a positive, though small, effect. ► There were differential impacts of various types of educational technology applications. ► Traditional computer-assisted instruction programs produced a small effect. ► Applications with the support of professional development showed more promising evidence. The purpose of this review is to learn from rigorous evaluations of alternative technology applications how features of using technology programs and characteristics of their evaluations affect reading outcomes for students in grades K-12. The review applies consistent inclusion standards to focus on studies that met high methodological standards. A total of 84 qualifying studies based on over 60,000K-12 participants were included in the final analysis. Consistent with previous reviews of similar focus, the findings suggest that educational technology applications generally produced a positive, though small, effect (ES=+0.16) in comparison to traditional methods. There were differential impacts of various types of educational technology applications. In particular, the types of supplementary computer-assisted instruction programs that have dominated the classroom use of educational technology in the past few decades were not found to produce educationally meaningful effects in reading for K-12 students (ES=+0.11), and the higher the methodological quality of the studies, the lower the effect size. In contrast, innovative technology applications and integrated literacy interventions with the support of extensive professional development showed more promising evidence. Although many more rigorous, especially randomized, studies of newer applications are needed, what unifies the methods found in this review to have great promise is the use of technologies in close connection with teachers’ efforts.
ISSN:1747-938X
1878-0385
DOI:10.1016/j.edurev.2012.05.002