Establishing cut-off values for apolipoprotein B and non-HDL-C according to LDL-C values in a South European population

Summary Background:  Low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL‐C) remains the primary target of therapy in most strategies of dyslipidaemia management focused on cardiovascular disease prevention. Different guidelines have identified specific LDL‐C cut‐off points as targets for therapeutic interventi...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of clinical practice (Esher) 2013-01, Vol.67 (1), p.81-88
Hauptverfasser: Martinez-Hervas, S., Real, J. T., Priego, M. A., Carratalá, A., Sniderman, A. D., Carmena, R., Ascaso, J. F.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Summary Background:  Low‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL‐C) remains the primary target of therapy in most strategies of dyslipidaemia management focused on cardiovascular disease prevention. Different guidelines have identified specific LDL‐C cut‐off points as targets for therapeutic intervention. Many clinical situations characterised by dyslipidaemia and elevated triglycerides are common in our environment and in overall industrialised countries. Thus, lipid goals based only on LDL‐C could misclassify an important percentage of subjects. The objective of the present study was to establish cut‐off point values for apoB and non‐HDL‐C in relation to the identified LDL‐C cut‐off points for cardiovascular risk in a South European population. Methods:  We performed a cross‐sectional study including 1501 subjects (770 women and 731 men) between 18 and 80 years of age. Samples were collected after 12–14 h of fasting. Cholesterol, HDL‐C, triglycerides and apoB levels were measured using direct methods. LDL‐C was calculated by the Friedewald formula. Non‐HDL‐C was calculated as total cholesterol minus HDL‐C. Results:  The Spearman’s rank correlations between apoB and LDL‐C (r 0.86, p 
ISSN:1368-5031
1742-1241
DOI:10.1111/j.1742-1241.2012.02998.x