Does thumb posture influence the mental rotation of hands?

► We tested the effect of thumb posture in a hand laterality judgement task. ► Thumb posture was modified in the stimulus pictures and for participants’ hands. ► Effect of stimulus thumb posture occurred only when participants’ thumbs were fixed. ► In palmar view, RTs for 90° orientations were influ...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Neuroscience letters 2013-02, Vol.534, p.139-144
Hauptverfasser: Bläsing, Bettina, Brugger, Peter, Weigelt, Matthias, Schack, Thomas
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:► We tested the effect of thumb posture in a hand laterality judgement task. ► Thumb posture was modified in the stimulus pictures and for participants’ hands. ► Effect of stimulus thumb posture occurred only when participants’ thumbs were fixed. ► In palmar view, RTs for 90° orientations were influenced by biomechanical constraints. The function of thumb posture in mental rotation has not yet been studied intensely, despite its special role in manual action. To investigate if thumb posture modifies relative visual and proprioceptive contributions, we conducted two experiments comprising hand laterality judgement tasks with identical stimuli (left and right hands in palmar and dorsal views presented at four orientations). In half of the stimuli, all digits were extended, whereas in the other half the thumb was flexed into the palm of the hand. In the second experiment, participants’ thumbs were taped in the same flexed posture that was displayed in half of the stimuli one hour previous to and throughout the experiment. Results of both experiments revealed effects of orientation, side and view on reaction time, but an effect of stimulus thumb posture occurred only in the second experiment in which participants’ thumbs were fixed. In palmar view, stimuli rotated by 90° with fingers pointing towards the participant's midline had shorter reaction times than stimuli rotated (evidentially less comfortably) in the opposite direction. This finding suggests that participants applied motor imagery strategies for palmar but not for dorsal views of the hand, indicating a difference in visual and sensorimotor familiarity.
ISSN:0304-3940
1872-7972
DOI:10.1016/j.neulet.2012.11.034