How Best to Assess the Quality of Life in Long-Term Survivors After Surgery for NSCLC? Comparison Between Clinical Predictors and Questionnaire Scores

Micro-Abstract Quality of life (QOL) is steadily gaining importance as an evaluation criterion for the clinical decision-making process in non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment. We have evaluated the clinical, surgical, and pulmonary function characteristics in 67 long-term lung cancer surviv...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Clinical lung cancer 2013, Vol.14 (1), p.78-87
Hauptverfasser: Sterzi, Silvia, Cesario, Alfredo, Cusumano, Giacomo, Corbo, Giuseppe, Lococo, Filippo, Biasotti, Barbara, Lapenna, Luisa Maria, Magrone, Giovanni, Dall'armi, Valentina, Meacci, Elisa, Porziella, Venanzio, Bonassi, Stefano, Margaritora, Stefano, Granone, Pierluigi
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Micro-Abstract Quality of life (QOL) is steadily gaining importance as an evaluation criterion for the clinical decision-making process in non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treatment. We have evaluated the clinical, surgical, and pulmonary function characteristics in 67 long-term lung cancer survivors who had surgery, to understand which clinical determinants (and therefore potential therapeutic targets) could better predict the QoL in these patients.
ISSN:1525-7304
1938-0690
DOI:10.1016/j.cllc.2012.04.002