Effect of a Safe Patient Handling Program on Rehabilitation Outcomes

Abstract Objective To evaluate the effect of a safe patient handling (SPH) program on rehabilitation mobility outcomes. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting A rehabilitation unit in a hospital system. Participants Consecutive patients (N=1291) over a 1-year period without an SPH program in pla...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 2013, Vol.94 (1), p.17-22
Hauptverfasser: Campo, Marc, PT, PhD, Shiyko, Mariya P., PhD, Margulis, Heather, PT, MS, Darragh, Amy R., OTR/L, PhD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Objective To evaluate the effect of a safe patient handling (SPH) program on rehabilitation mobility outcomes. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting A rehabilitation unit in a hospital system. Participants Consecutive patients (N=1291) over a 1-year period without an SPH program in place (n=507) and consecutive patients over a 1-year period with an SPH program in place (n=784). Interventions The SPH program consisted of administrative policies and patient handling technologies. The policies limited manual patient handling. Equipment included ceiling- and floor-based dependent lifts, sit-to-stand assists, ambulation aides, friction-reducing devices, motorized hospital beds and shower chairs, and multihandled gait belts. Main Outcome Measures The mobility subscale of the FIM. Results Patients rehabilitated in the group with SPH achieved similar outcomes to patients rehabilitated in the group without SPH. A significant difference between groups was noted for patients with initial mobility FIM scores of 15.1 and higher after controlling for initial mobility FIM score, age, length of stay, and diagnosis. Those patients performed better with SPH. Conclusions SPH programs do not appear to inhibit recovery. Fears among therapists that the use of equipment may lead to dependence may be unfounded.
ISSN:0003-9993
1532-821X
DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2012.08.213