Chronic HCV infection was associated with severe insulin resistance and mild atherosclerosis: a population-based study in an HCV hyperendemic area

Background Hepatitis C virus (HCV) affects glucose and lipid metabolism in vitro; however, it is unclear whether HCV infection is associated with insulin resistance and atherosclerosis at the population level. We aimed to investigate this association in a Japanese cohort of the Seven Countries Study...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of gastroenterology 2013, Vol.48 (1), p.93-100
Hauptverfasser: Miyajima, Ichiro, Kawaguchi, Takumi, Fukami, Ako, Nagao, Yumiko, Adachi, Hisashi, Sasaki, Satoshi, Imaizumi, Tsutomu, Sata, Michio
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background Hepatitis C virus (HCV) affects glucose and lipid metabolism in vitro; however, it is unclear whether HCV infection is associated with insulin resistance and atherosclerosis at the population level. We aimed to investigate this association in a Japanese cohort of the Seven Countries Study, and our investigation was conducted in Tanushimaru, an HCV hyperendemic area. Methods A total of 1908 inhabitants of Tanushimaru were classified into 3 groups according to HCV infection status: those who were uninfected ( n  = 1780), those with transient infection ( n  = 88), and those with chronic infection ( n  = 40). Insulin resistance and atherosclerosis were evaluated by homeostasis model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR) and carotid intima–media thickness (IMT), respectively. Intergroup differences in variables were evaluated by age- and sex-matched multivariate regression analysis. Results Significant intergroup differences were seen in fasting glucose and insulin levels. The HOMA-IR value was significantly higher in the group with chronic infection than the values in the uninfected and transiently infected groups (3.0 ± 0.39 vs. 1.3 ± 0.03 vs. 1.5 ± 0.14; P  
ISSN:0944-1174
1435-5922
DOI:10.1007/s00535-012-0610-3