Evidence of a Low Prevalence of RAS Mutations in a Large Medullary Thyroid Cancer Series

Background: Approximately 60% of sporadic medullary thyroid carcinomas (sMTC) remain orphan of a recognized genetic cause. Recently, a high percentage of RAS point mutations have been described in RET -negative sMTC. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of RAS point mutations in a larg...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Thyroid (New York, N.Y.) N.Y.), 2013-01, Vol.23 (1), p.5-57
Hauptverfasser: Ciampi, Raffaele, Mian, Caterina, Fugazzola, Laura, Cosci, Barbara, Romei, Cristina, Barollo, Susi, Cirello, Valentina, Bottici, Valeria, Marconcini, Giulia, Rosa, Pelizzo Maria, Borrello, Maria Grazia, Basolo, Fulvio, Ugolini, Clara, Materazzi, Gabriele, Pinchera, Aldo, Elisei, Rossella
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background: Approximately 60% of sporadic medullary thyroid carcinomas (sMTC) remain orphan of a recognized genetic cause. Recently, a high percentage of RAS point mutations have been described in RET -negative sMTC. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of RAS point mutations in a large series of MTC collected in four Italian centers. Methods: For this purpose, we studied codons 12, 13, and 61 of H-, K-, and N- RAS genes in 188 MTC samples, either hereditary or sporadic, by direct sequencing. Correlations between the RAS mutational status and the clinical-pathological features of MTC patients as well as a meta-analysis of all published data were performed. Results: The prevalence of RAS mutations in the present series of MTC was 10.1%, and 17.6% when considering only RET -negative cases. RAS mutations were found in MTC tumoral tissue, but not in peripheral blood indicating their somatic origin. A novel mutation in codon 72 (M72I) was found, but with a low or null transforming potential. No association was found between the presence of RAS mutations and the clinical-pathological features of the patients. Although not statistically significant, a positive association between the presence of RAS mutations and a better outcome was observed. The meta-analysis of all published studies confirmed a prevalence of 8.8% for RAS mutations in MTC. Conclusions: The prevalence of RAS mutations in our MTC series was relatively low and consistent with the meta-analysis data. Only somatic RAS mutations were found and only in RET -negative sMTC. Likewise, MTCs that harbor a RAS mutation identify a subgroup of tumors with less aggressive behavior. To our knowledge, this is the largest series of MTCs studied for the presence of mutations in RAS genes and the first meta-analysis on this specific topic.
ISSN:1050-7256
1557-9077
DOI:10.1089/thy.2012.0207