Transfusion Strategies for Acute Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding

A randomized clinical trial shows that among patients with upper GI bleeding, withholding transfusion until the hemoglobin level falls below 7 g per deciliter results in better outcomes than using 9 g per deciliter as the trigger for transfusion. Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding is a common eme...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The New England journal of medicine 2013-01, Vol.368 (1), p.11-21
Hauptverfasser: Villanueva, Càndid, Colomo, Alan, Bosch, Alba, Concepción, Mar, Hernandez-Gea, Virginia, Aracil, Carles, Graupera, Isabel, Poca, María, Alvarez-Urturi, Cristina, Gordillo, Jordi, Guarner-Argente, Carlos, Santaló, Miquel, Muñiz, Eduardo, Guarner, Carlos
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:A randomized clinical trial shows that among patients with upper GI bleeding, withholding transfusion until the hemoglobin level falls below 7 g per deciliter results in better outcomes than using 9 g per deciliter as the trigger for transfusion. Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding is a common emergency condition associated with high morbidity and mortality. 1 It is a frequent indication for red-cell transfusion, because acute blood loss can decrease tissue perfusion and the delivery of oxygen to tissues. Transfusion may be lifesaving in patients with massive exsanguinating bleeding. However, in most cases hemorrhage is not so severe, and in such circumstances the safest and most effective transfusion strategy is controversial. 2 , 3 Restricted transfusion strategies may be appropriate in some settings. Controlled trials have shown that for critically ill patients, a restrictive transfusion strategy is at least as effective as a . . .
ISSN:0028-4793
1533-4406
DOI:10.1056/NEJMoa1211801