Intraaortic Balloon Support for Cardiogenic Shock
To the Editor: In the study by Thiele et al. (Oct. 4 issue) 1 on the use of intraaortic balloon counterpulsation (IABP) in patients with cardiogenic shock caused by acute myocardial infarction, the authors' conclusion that IABP did not significantly reduce 30-day mortality has to be taken with...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The New England journal of medicine 2013-01, Vol.368 (1), p.80-81 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | To the Editor:
In the study by Thiele et al. (Oct. 4 issue)
1
on the use of intraaortic balloon counterpulsation (IABP) in patients with cardiogenic shock caused by acute myocardial infarction, the authors' conclusion that IABP did not significantly reduce 30-day mortality has to be taken with caution. In one fourth of the patients in the study, the right coronary artery was the infarct-related vessel and right ventricular infarction might have contributed to the hemodynamics.
Furthermore, the average systolic blood pressure was 89 mm Hg, and the mean heart rate was 92 beats per minute. In many patients, the inclusion . . . |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0028-4793 1533-4406 |
DOI: | 10.1056/NEJMc1213513 |