Determining the frequency, depth and velocity of preferential flow by high frequency soil moisture monitoring

Preferential flow in agricultural soils has been demonstrated to result in agrochemical mobilisation to shallow ground water. Land managers and environmental regulators need simple cost effective techniques for identifying soil – land use combinations in which preferential flow occurs. Existing tech...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of contaminant hydrology 2013-01, Vol.144 (1), p.66-77
Hauptverfasser: Hardie, Marcus, Lisson, Shaun, Doyle, Richard, Cotching, William
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Preferential flow in agricultural soils has been demonstrated to result in agrochemical mobilisation to shallow ground water. Land managers and environmental regulators need simple cost effective techniques for identifying soil – land use combinations in which preferential flow occurs. Existing techniques for identifying preferential flow have a range of limitations including; often being destructive, non in situ, small sampling volumes, or are subject to artificial boundary conditions. This study demonstrated that high frequency soil moisture monitoring using a multi-sensory capacitance probe mounted within a vertically rammed access tube, was able to determine the occurrence, depth, and wetting front velocity of preferential flow events following rainfall. Occurrence of preferential flow was not related to either rainfall intensity or rainfall amount, rather preferential flow occurred when antecedent soil moisture content was below 226mm soil moisture storage (0–70cm). Results indicate that high temporal frequency soil moisture monitoring may be used to identify soil type – land use combinations in which the presence of preferential flow increases the risk of shallow groundwater contamination by rapid transport of agrochemicals through the soil profile. However use of high frequency based soil moisture monitoring to determine agrochemical mobilisation risk may be limited by, inability to determine the volume of preferential flow, difficulty observing macropore flow at high antecedent soil moisture content, and creation of artificial voids during installation of access tubes in stony soils. ► Occurrence of preferential flow was determined by soil moisture monitoring. ► Occurrence of preferential flow was not related to rainfall amount or intensity. ► Preferential flow occurred below a soil moisture content threshold. ► Agrochemical mobilisation risk can be determined by soil moisture monitoring.
ISSN:0169-7722
1873-6009
DOI:10.1016/j.jconhyd.2012.10.008