Hydrogen environment embrittlement of stable austenitic steels
Seven stable austenitic steels (stable with respect to γ → α′ transformation at room temperature) of different alloy compositions (18Cr–12.5Ni, 18Cr–35Ni, 18Cr–8Ni–6Mn–0.25N, 0.6C–23Mn, 1.3C–12Mn, 1C–31Mn–9Al, 18Cr–19Mn–0.8N) were tensile tested in high-pressure hydrogen atmosphere to assess the rol...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of hydrogen energy 2012-11, Vol.37 (21), p.16231-16246 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Seven stable austenitic steels (stable with respect to γ → α′ transformation at room temperature) of different alloy compositions (18Cr–12.5Ni, 18Cr–35Ni, 18Cr–8Ni–6Mn–0.25N, 0.6C–23Mn, 1.3C–12Mn, 1C–31Mn–9Al, 18Cr–19Mn–0.8N) were tensile tested in high-pressure hydrogen atmosphere to assess the role of austenite stability on hydrogen environment embrittlement (HEE). The influence of hydrogen on tensile ductility was small in steels that are believed to have a high initial portion of dislocation cross slip (18Cr–12.5Ni, 18Cr–35Ni, 18Cr–8Ni–6Mn–0.25N), while the effects of hydrogen were significantly greater in steels with other primary deformation modes (planar slip in 18Cr–19Mn–0.8N and 1C–31Mn–9Al or mechanical twinning in 0.6C–23Mn and 1.3C–12Mn) despite comparable austenite stability at the given test conditions. It appears that initial deformation mode is one important parameter controlling susceptibility to HEE and that martensitic transformation is not a sufficient explanation for HEE of austenitic steels.
► The effect of hydrogen on tensile ductility was low in steels with high initial portion of dislocation cross slip. ► The effect of hydrogen on tensile ductility was high in steels with other primary deformation modes. ► The effect of hydrogen on tensile ductility was independent of the stacking fault energy. ► Martensitic transformation is not a sufficient explanation for HEE of austenitic steels. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0360-3199 1879-3487 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2012.08.071 |