Vagus nerve stimulation in drug-resistant epilepsies. Analysis of potential prognostic factors in a cohort of patients with long-term follow-up

Background The results of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) for the treatment of drug-resistant epilepsies are highly variable due to the lack of defined patient’s selection criteria and a follow-up of published studies being generally too short. Here we report the outcome of VNS in a series with long-t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Acta neurochirurgica 2012-12, Vol.154 (12), p.2237-2240
Hauptverfasser: Colicchio, Gabriella, Montano, Nicola, Fuggetta, Filomena, Papacci, Fabio, Signorelli, Francesco, Meglio, Mario
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background The results of vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) for the treatment of drug-resistant epilepsies are highly variable due to the lack of defined patient’s selection criteria and a follow-up of published studies being generally too short. Here we report the outcome of VNS in a series with long-term follow-up and try to identify subgroups of patients who could be better candidates for this procedure. Method We studied 53 patients (33 male, 20 female) with a prospectively recorded follow-up (mean, 55.96 ± 43.53 months). The monthly average seizure frequency for each patient at baseline, 3, 6, 12 months, and each year until the latest follow-up after implant was measured and the percentage of “responders” and response time (RT) were calculated. We investigated the following potential prognostic role of these factors: age of onset of epilepsy, pre-implant epilepsy duration, etiology, and age at implant. Results Globally, 40 % of patients responded to VNS (mean RT, 14.85 ± 16.85 months). Lesional etiology ( p  = 0.0179, logrank test), particularly ischemia ( p  = 0.011, Fisher exact test) and tuberous sclerosis ( p  = 0.0229, Fisher exact test), and age at implant
ISSN:0001-6268
0942-0940
DOI:10.1007/s00701-012-1524-9