Early Identification of Small Airways Disease on Lung Cancer Screening CT: Comparison of Current Air Trapping Measures
Background Lung cancer screening CT scans might provide valuable information about air trapping as an early indicator of smoking-related lung disease. We studied which of the currently suggested measures is most suitable for detecting functionally relevant air trapping on low-dose computed tomograph...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Lung 2012-12, Vol.190 (6), p.629-633 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background
Lung cancer screening CT scans might provide valuable information about air trapping as an early indicator of smoking-related lung disease. We studied which of the currently suggested measures is most suitable for detecting functionally relevant air trapping on low-dose computed tomography (CT) in a population of subjects with early-stage disease.
Methods
This study was ethically approved and informed consent was obtained. Three quantitative CT air trapping measures were compared against a functional reference standard in 427 male lung cancer screening participants. This reference standard for air trapping was derived from the residual volume over total lung capacity ratio (RV/TLC) beyond the 95th percentile of predicted. The following CT air trapping measures were compared: expiratory to inspiratory relative volume change of voxels with attenuation values between −860 and −950 Hounsfield Units (RVC
−860 to −950
), expiratory to inspiratory ratio of mean lung density (E/I-ratio
MLD
) and percentage of voxels below −856 HU in expiration (EXP
−856
). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed and area under the ROC curve compared.
Results
Functionally relevant air trapping was present in 38 (8.9 %) participants. E/I-ratio
MLD
showed the largest area under the curve (0.85, 95 % CI 0.813–0.883), which was significantly larger than RVC
−860 to −950
(0.703, 0.657–0.746;
p
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 0341-2040 1432-1750 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s00408-012-9422-8 |