Affordances of the Care Environment for People with Dementia—An Assessment Study
Background: Evidence on the importance of the physical environment for the well-being of people with dementia has been growing steadily. Objective: This article aims to (1) introduce an assessment tool for evaluating the physical care environment for people with dementia; (2) describe the method...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | HERD 2012-07, Vol.5 (4), p.118-138 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 138 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 118 |
container_title | HERD |
container_volume | 5 |
creator | Topo, Päivi Kotilainen, Helinä Eloniemi-Sulkava, Ulla |
description | Background:
Evidence on the importance of the physical environment for the well-being of
people with dementia has been growing steadily.
Objective:
This article aims to (1) introduce an assessment tool for evaluating the
physical care environment for people with dementia; (2) describe the
method's initial results and the subsequent feedback provided to the 10 care
units; and (3) describe the follow-up results 1 year later. The goal has
been to provide care workers and managers with information that affects the
well-being of people with dementia and to provide this information on the
care environment in the context of their own work environment.
Methods:
The assessment was part of a randomized controlled intervention using
nonpharmaceutical methods to decrease behavioral and psychological symptoms
of people with dementia. During the half-day visits, photographs and field
notes were taken, and a final assessment was carried out via the Residential
Care Environment Assessment (RCEA) tool developed at the beginning of the
study and based on affordance theory. Follow-up data were gathered after 12
months.
Results:
There were several possibilities for improvements in the provision of
residential care in a person-centered environment. Improvements were needed
mostly in comfort and in providing opportunities for engagement, activity,
and expression of identity. However, in practice, it was difficult to
achieve the improvements even with an intensive intervention study.
Conclusions:
The authors conclude that the physical care environment involves a complex
set of issues and stakeholders in which the impetus to fulfill
responsibilities to carry out improvements can easily fall away. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/193758671200500410 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1237507972</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_193758671200500410</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2862803471</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-b21f4aa1212132890731d924e3c3dd38f11b7040c2e0a44b0fd3c75d7c7971493</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10MtKxDAUBuAgijOOvoALCbhxUycnaZt2WcbxAgOKl3VJ21OnQy9j0iqz8yF8Qp_E1BlFFMkiEL7z5_ATcgjsFEDKMYRCeoEvgTPmMeYC2yJDDr50PAC-TYY9cHoxIHvGLBjzfV_yXTLggnM3ABiS2yjPG52pOkVDm5y2c6QTpZFO6-dCN3WFdUutoDfYLEukL0U7p2fYPxfq_fUtqmlkDBrzCe_aLlvtk51clQYPNveIPJxP7yeXzuz64moSzZxUSGidhEPuKgXcHsGDkEkBWchdFKnIMhHkAIlkLks5MuW6CcszkUovk6kMJbihGJGTde5SN08dmjauCpNiWaoam87EwG09zGJu6fEvumg6XdvtrPIDyZkQveJrlerGGI15vNRFpfQqBhb3jcd_G7dDR5voLqkw-x75qtiC8RoY9Yg__v0_8gMx0IcT</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1268720332</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Affordances of the Care Environment for People with Dementia—An Assessment Study</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Topo, Päivi ; Kotilainen, Helinä ; Eloniemi-Sulkava, Ulla</creator><creatorcontrib>Topo, Päivi ; Kotilainen, Helinä ; Eloniemi-Sulkava, Ulla</creatorcontrib><description>Background:
Evidence on the importance of the physical environment for the well-being of
people with dementia has been growing steadily.
Objective:
This article aims to (1) introduce an assessment tool for evaluating the
physical care environment for people with dementia; (2) describe the
method's initial results and the subsequent feedback provided to the 10 care
units; and (3) describe the follow-up results 1 year later. The goal has
been to provide care workers and managers with information that affects the
well-being of people with dementia and to provide this information on the
care environment in the context of their own work environment.
Methods:
The assessment was part of a randomized controlled intervention using
nonpharmaceutical methods to decrease behavioral and psychological symptoms
of people with dementia. During the half-day visits, photographs and field
notes were taken, and a final assessment was carried out via the Residential
Care Environment Assessment (RCEA) tool developed at the beginning of the
study and based on affordance theory. Follow-up data were gathered after 12
months.
Results:
There were several possibilities for improvements in the provision of
residential care in a person-centered environment. Improvements were needed
mostly in comfort and in providing opportunities for engagement, activity,
and expression of identity. However, in practice, it was difficult to
achieve the improvements even with an intensive intervention study.
Conclusions:
The authors conclude that the physical care environment involves a complex
set of issues and stakeholders in which the impetus to fulfill
responsibilities to carry out improvements can easily fall away.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1937-5867</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2167-5112</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/193758671200500410</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23224811</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Dementia ; Environment ; Health Personnel ; Humans</subject><ispartof>HERD, 2012-07, Vol.5 (4), p.118-138</ispartof><rights>2012 Vendome Group, LLC</rights><rights>Copyright Vendome Group LLC Summer 2012</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-b21f4aa1212132890731d924e3c3dd38f11b7040c2e0a44b0fd3c75d7c7971493</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-b21f4aa1212132890731d924e3c3dd38f11b7040c2e0a44b0fd3c75d7c7971493</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/193758671200500410$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/193758671200500410$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,21800,27905,27906,43602,43603</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23224811$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Topo, Päivi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kotilainen, Helinä</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eloniemi-Sulkava, Ulla</creatorcontrib><title>Affordances of the Care Environment for People with Dementia—An Assessment Study</title><title>HERD</title><addtitle>HERD</addtitle><description>Background:
Evidence on the importance of the physical environment for the well-being of
people with dementia has been growing steadily.
Objective:
This article aims to (1) introduce an assessment tool for evaluating the
physical care environment for people with dementia; (2) describe the
method's initial results and the subsequent feedback provided to the 10 care
units; and (3) describe the follow-up results 1 year later. The goal has
been to provide care workers and managers with information that affects the
well-being of people with dementia and to provide this information on the
care environment in the context of their own work environment.
Methods:
The assessment was part of a randomized controlled intervention using
nonpharmaceutical methods to decrease behavioral and psychological symptoms
of people with dementia. During the half-day visits, photographs and field
notes were taken, and a final assessment was carried out via the Residential
Care Environment Assessment (RCEA) tool developed at the beginning of the
study and based on affordance theory. Follow-up data were gathered after 12
months.
Results:
There were several possibilities for improvements in the provision of
residential care in a person-centered environment. Improvements were needed
mostly in comfort and in providing opportunities for engagement, activity,
and expression of identity. However, in practice, it was difficult to
achieve the improvements even with an intensive intervention study.
Conclusions:
The authors conclude that the physical care environment involves a complex
set of issues and stakeholders in which the impetus to fulfill
responsibilities to carry out improvements can easily fall away.</description><subject>Dementia</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Health Personnel</subject><subject>Humans</subject><issn>1937-5867</issn><issn>2167-5112</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp10MtKxDAUBuAgijOOvoALCbhxUycnaZt2WcbxAgOKl3VJ21OnQy9j0iqz8yF8Qp_E1BlFFMkiEL7z5_ATcgjsFEDKMYRCeoEvgTPmMeYC2yJDDr50PAC-TYY9cHoxIHvGLBjzfV_yXTLggnM3ABiS2yjPG52pOkVDm5y2c6QTpZFO6-dCN3WFdUutoDfYLEukL0U7p2fYPxfq_fUtqmlkDBrzCe_aLlvtk51clQYPNveIPJxP7yeXzuz64moSzZxUSGidhEPuKgXcHsGDkEkBWchdFKnIMhHkAIlkLks5MuW6CcszkUovk6kMJbihGJGTde5SN08dmjauCpNiWaoam87EwG09zGJu6fEvumg6XdvtrPIDyZkQveJrlerGGI15vNRFpfQqBhb3jcd_G7dDR5voLqkw-x75qtiC8RoY9Yg__v0_8gMx0IcT</recordid><startdate>201207</startdate><enddate>201207</enddate><creator>Topo, Päivi</creator><creator>Kotilainen, Helinä</creator><creator>Eloniemi-Sulkava, Ulla</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>Sage Publications Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4S-</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201207</creationdate><title>Affordances of the Care Environment for People with Dementia—An Assessment Study</title><author>Topo, Päivi ; Kotilainen, Helinä ; Eloniemi-Sulkava, Ulla</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c371t-b21f4aa1212132890731d924e3c3dd38f11b7040c2e0a44b0fd3c75d7c7971493</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Dementia</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Health Personnel</topic><topic>Humans</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Topo, Päivi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kotilainen, Helinä</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eloniemi-Sulkava, Ulla</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>BPIR.com Limited</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>HERD</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Topo, Päivi</au><au>Kotilainen, Helinä</au><au>Eloniemi-Sulkava, Ulla</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Affordances of the Care Environment for People with Dementia—An Assessment Study</atitle><jtitle>HERD</jtitle><addtitle>HERD</addtitle><date>2012-07</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>5</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>118</spage><epage>138</epage><pages>118-138</pages><issn>1937-5867</issn><eissn>2167-5112</eissn><abstract>Background:
Evidence on the importance of the physical environment for the well-being of
people with dementia has been growing steadily.
Objective:
This article aims to (1) introduce an assessment tool for evaluating the
physical care environment for people with dementia; (2) describe the
method's initial results and the subsequent feedback provided to the 10 care
units; and (3) describe the follow-up results 1 year later. The goal has
been to provide care workers and managers with information that affects the
well-being of people with dementia and to provide this information on the
care environment in the context of their own work environment.
Methods:
The assessment was part of a randomized controlled intervention using
nonpharmaceutical methods to decrease behavioral and psychological symptoms
of people with dementia. During the half-day visits, photographs and field
notes were taken, and a final assessment was carried out via the Residential
Care Environment Assessment (RCEA) tool developed at the beginning of the
study and based on affordance theory. Follow-up data were gathered after 12
months.
Results:
There were several possibilities for improvements in the provision of
residential care in a person-centered environment. Improvements were needed
mostly in comfort and in providing opportunities for engagement, activity,
and expression of identity. However, in practice, it was difficult to
achieve the improvements even with an intensive intervention study.
Conclusions:
The authors conclude that the physical care environment involves a complex
set of issues and stakeholders in which the impetus to fulfill
responsibilities to carry out improvements can easily fall away.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><pmid>23224811</pmid><doi>10.1177/193758671200500410</doi><tpages>21</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1937-5867 |
ispartof | HERD, 2012-07, Vol.5 (4), p.118-138 |
issn | 1937-5867 2167-5112 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1237507972 |
source | MEDLINE; SAGE Complete A-Z List |
subjects | Dementia Environment Health Personnel Humans |
title | Affordances of the Care Environment for People with Dementia—An Assessment Study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T09%3A52%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Affordances%20of%20the%20Care%20Environment%20for%20People%20with%20Dementia%E2%80%94An%20Assessment%20Study&rft.jtitle=HERD&rft.au=Topo,%20P%C3%A4ivi&rft.date=2012-07&rft.volume=5&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=118&rft.epage=138&rft.pages=118-138&rft.issn=1937-5867&rft.eissn=2167-5112&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/193758671200500410&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2862803471%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1268720332&rft_id=info:pmid/23224811&rft_sage_id=10.1177_193758671200500410&rfr_iscdi=true |