Fouling behaviours of two membranes in a submerged membrane bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment

► PAN membrane had a lower fouling rate than PVDF membrane. ► PAN membrane rejected more SMP than PVDF membrane due to the pore sizes. ► PVDF membrane rejected more carbohydrates and fewer proteins than the PAN membrane. ► HPO and HPI-N had highest fouling potential for PAN and PVDF membrane, respec...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of membrane science 2011-10, Vol.382 (1), p.60-69
Hauptverfasser: Wang, Pan, Wang, Zhiwei, Wu, Zhichao, Mai, Suihai
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:► PAN membrane had a lower fouling rate than PVDF membrane. ► PAN membrane rejected more SMP than PVDF membrane due to the pore sizes. ► PVDF membrane rejected more carbohydrates and fewer proteins than the PAN membrane. ► HPO and HPI-N had highest fouling potential for PAN and PVDF membrane, respectively. Filtration performances and fouling behaviours of polyacrylonitrile (PAN) and polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membranes were studied in a pilot-scale membrane bioreactor. Results showed that removable fouling was dominant for both membranes while irremovable fouling of the PVDF membrane was severer than that of the PAN membrane. The PAN membrane could reject more soluble microbial products (SMP) than the PVDF membrane due to different pore sizes. The PVDF membrane rejected more carbohydrates and fewer proteins than the PAN membrane. The mean particle size of surface foulants on the PAN membrane was smaller than that on the PVDF membrane. Gel filtration chromatography analysis indicated that the surface foulants of the PVDF membrane were comprised of larger molecular weight molecules than those of the PAN membrane. Three-dimensional excitation–emission matrix fluorescence spectroscopy analysis showed that soluble microbial by-product-like substances were the key factor causing membrane fouling of the two membranes. Hydrophobic humic-like substances played a more important role in forming irremovable fouling of the PAN membrane whereas protein-like substances were the main contributor to the irremovable fouling of the PVDF membrane. Hydrophobic fraction had the largest fouling propensity for the PAN membrane, while neutral hydrophilic fraction demonstrated the strongest fouling potential for the PVDF membrane.
ISSN:0376-7388
1873-3123
DOI:10.1016/j.memsci.2011.07.044