Risk of second primary in situ and invasive melanoma in a Dutch population-based cohort: 1989-2008
Summary Background Patients with melanoma are at increased risk of developing a subsequent melanoma. Objectives To estimate the risks of developing a second primary in situ or invasive cutaneous melanoma after a first melanoma, between 1989 and 2008. Methods Patients were followed until diagnosis...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | British journal of dermatology (1951) 2012-12, Vol.167 (6), p.1321-1330 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Summary
Background Patients with melanoma are at increased risk of developing a subsequent melanoma.
Objectives To estimate the risks of developing a second primary in situ or invasive cutaneous melanoma after a first melanoma, between 1989 and 2008.
Methods Patients were followed until diagnosis of a second melanoma, date of death or end of study. Cumulative risks, standardized incidence ratio (SIR, observed second melanomas divided by background age‐, calendar‐ and sex‐specific incidence rates of melanoma, as recorded in the Netherlands Cancer Registry) and absolute excess risk (AER, observed minus expected per 10 000 person‐years) of second melanomas were calculated.
Results In total, 10 765 patients with in situ melanoma and 46 700 with invasive melanoma were included. The cumulative risks of a second invasive melanoma after a first in situ or invasive melanoma at 20 years of follow‐up were 6·2% and 5·0%, respectively. The relative risk of developing any melanoma (in situ or invasive) after any first melanoma (measured as SIR) varied from 12·4‐fold [invasive after invasive melanoma; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 11·6–13·2] to 26·4‐fold (in situ after in situ melanoma; 95% CI = 22·6–30·7) increase compared with the general population. SIRs and AERs remained elevated up to 20 years after the first melanoma.
Conclusions This study shows significantly increased long‐term risks (both relative and absolute) of developing a second invasive melanoma after a first melanoma (invasive and in situ), and might serve as a basis for follow‐up guidelines. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0007-0963 1365-2133 |
DOI: | 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2012.11123.x |