Role of EDTA in arsenic mobilization and its uptake by maize grown on an As-polluted soil

► Treating soil with EDTA increased water soluble and AB-DTPA extractable As significantly. ► Shoots As uptake increased significantly by EDTA applications. ► Roots As uptake did not increase significantly except at 2.5 and 5.0mmolkg−1 EDTA. ► Applications of EDTA in the presence of maize plant are...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Chemosphere (Oxford) 2013-01, Vol.90 (2), p.588-594
Hauptverfasser: Abbas, Mohamed H.H., Abdelhafez, Ahmed A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:► Treating soil with EDTA increased water soluble and AB-DTPA extractable As significantly. ► Shoots As uptake increased significantly by EDTA applications. ► Roots As uptake did not increase significantly except at 2.5 and 5.0mmolkg−1 EDTA. ► Applications of EDTA in the presence of maize plant are unsuitable for As phytoextraction. ► Only shoots of maize plants grown on soil without EDTA treatment can be used in animal feeding. EDTA amendments are widely used for micronutrient fertilization in arid soils, besides their effectiveness in the remediation process of heavy metal from contaminated soils. However, the persistence of EDTA in arsenic contaminated soil may have further negative effects on the grown plants. To investigate the influences of EDTA on soil As, a pot experiment was conducted using a sandy clay loam As-polluted soil treated with gradual rates of EDTA (0, 1.0, 2.5 and 5mmolkg−1) and planted with maize for two months. The key findings reveal that EDTA applications increased AB-DTPA extractable and water soluble As significantly. Such increases seemed to be the main reasons behind the increase in As uptake by maize plants as the addition of EDTA at the rates of 1.0, 2.5 and 5.0mmolkg−1 increased significantly As uptake by shoots 1.5, 2.4 and 3.0 folds, respectively compared to the untreated soil. On the other hand, As uptake by roots did not increase significantly except with the highest application rates of 2.5 and 5.0mmolkg−1. The results also show that arsenic translocation factor (TF) values were too low to attain successful phytoextraction. In conclusion, the bioavailable fraction of As is important to investigate the phytoextraction and phytotoxicity of As.
ISSN:0045-6535
1879-1298
DOI:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.08.042