Feasibility and safety of EUS-guided cryothermal ablation in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer

Background New therapies are needed for pancreatic cancer. Objective To determine the feasibility and safety of a new endoscopic treatment. Secondary endpoints were to determine effects on tumor growth measured with CT scan and to find the overall survival. Design A cohort study of patients with loc...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Gastrointestinal endoscopy 2012-12, Vol.76 (6), p.1142-1151
Hauptverfasser: Arcidiacono, Paolo Giorgio, MD, Carrara, Silvia, MD, Reni, Michele, MD, Petrone, Maria Chiara, MD, Cappio, Stefano, MD, Balzano, Gianpaolo, MD, Boemo, Cinzia, MD, Cereda, Stefano, MD, Nicoletti, Roberto, MD, Enderle, Markus Dominik, MD, Neugebauer, Alexander, PhD, von Renteln, Daniel, MD, Eickhoff, Axel, MD, Testoni, Pier Alberto, MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background New therapies are needed for pancreatic cancer. Objective To determine the feasibility and safety of a new endoscopic treatment. Secondary endpoints were to determine effects on tumor growth measured with CT scan and to find the overall survival. Design A cohort study of patients with local progression of advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma after neoadjuvant therapy. The cryotherm probe (CTP), a flexible bipolar device that combines radiofrequency with cryogenic cooling, was used under EUS guidance. Setting San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy; University Medical Center, Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany. Patients A total of 22 patients (male/female 11/11; mean age 61.9 years) were enrolled from September 2009 to May 2011. Intervention Radiofrequency heating: 18 W; pressure for cooling: 650 psi (Pounds per Square Inch); application time: depending on tumor size. Main Outcome Measurements Feasibility was evaluated during the procedure. A clinical and radiologic follow-up was planned. Results The CTP was successfully applied in 16 patients (72.8%); in 6 it was not possible because of stiffness of the GI wall and of the tumor. Amylase arose in 3 of 16 patients; none had clinical signs of pancreatitis. Late complications arose in 4 cases: 3 were mostly related to tumor progression. Median postablation survival time was 6 months. A CT scan was performed in all patients, but only in 6 of 16 was it possible to clearly define the tumor margins after ablation. In these patients, the tumor appeared smaller compared with the initial mass ( P = .07). Limitations Small sample of patients, difficulty of objectifying the size of the ablated zone by CT scan. Conclusion EUS-guided CTP ablation is feasible and safe. Further investigations are needed to demonstrate progression-free survival and local control.
ISSN:0016-5107
1097-6779
DOI:10.1016/j.gie.2012.08.006