Photoelastic analysis of stresses transmitted by universal cast to long abutment on implant-supported single restorations under static occlusal loads

The aim of this study was to compare the stresses resulting from cemented or screw-retained dental prostheses using universal cast to long abutment by the photoelastic method. A photoelastic resin model was fabricated to simulate a segment of the mandibular arch with resin replicas of a first premol...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of craniofacial surgery 2012-11, Vol.23 (7 Suppl 1), p.2019-S81
Hauptverfasser: Aguiar, Jr, Fábio Afrânio de, Tiossi, Rodrigo, Macedo, Ana Paula, Mattos, Maria da Gloria Chiarello de, Ribeiro, Ricardo Faria, Rodrigues, Renata Cristina Silveira
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:The aim of this study was to compare the stresses resulting from cemented or screw-retained dental prostheses using universal cast to long abutment by the photoelastic method. A photoelastic resin model was fabricated to simulate a segment of the mandibular arch with resin replicas of a first premolar and a second molar, and two 3.75 × 11-mm implants replacing the second premolar and the first molar. Vertical static loads were individually applied on the occlusal surface of the premolar and the molar (5 kgf) and simultaneously on both crowns (10 kgf). Results found variable stress patterns around each implant and concentrated stresses in the individually loaded crowns. Force transfer characteristics of each situation and quantification of the isochromatic fringes were evaluated. Within the limitations of this study and based on the results obtained for implant-supported prosthesis with internal hexagon connection/universal cast to long abutment, it could be concluded that single adjacent screw-retained prosthetic restorations lead to higher stresses around the implants when compared with cement-retained restorations.
ISSN:1049-2275
1536-3732
DOI:10.1097/SCS.0b013e3182597c09