Secondary burial cemeteries, visibility and land tenure: A view from the southern Levant Chalcolithic period
► We examine the distribution of secondary burial sites across the landscape. ► We compare their spatial and visibility aspects to a matched control group. ► Areas seen from cemeteries are significantly larger than the areas seen from habitation sites. ► Their location increases the visible areas se...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of anthropological archaeology 2012-12, Vol.31 (4), p.423-438 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | ► We examine the distribution of secondary burial sites across the landscape. ► We compare their spatial and visibility aspects to a matched control group. ► Areas seen from cemeteries are significantly larger than the areas seen from habitation sites. ► Their location increases the visible areas seen from habitation sites, rather than overlaps them. ► Distribution of secondary burial sites reflects an element of land tenure system.
Off-site secondary burial cemeteries in the southern Levant are an innovation of the Chalcolithic period. Ethnographic studies suggest that location of burial places was one of the means used to establish and socially mediate ownership over the landscape. The current research examines whether the spatial pattern of burial sites during the Chalcolithic period in the southern Levant represents a land tenure system. Spatial analyses of burial and habitation sites located mainly along the central Israeli coastal area indicate that Ghassulian communities avoided locating their burial sites near habitation sites concentrations. Viewshed analysis indicates that the areas observed from burial sites are significantly larger than those observed from habitation sites, and that their location scattered across an area which increases rather than overlaps the size of area visible from the habitation sites. Furthermore, our results show that communities which wanted to claim land tenure over a larger territory use burial sites locations in order to maximize the observed area within habitation sites surroundings. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0278-4165 1090-2686 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.jaa.2012.03.002 |