Study of B-Cell Subpopulations in Lung Transplant Recipients With Posttransplant Infection
Abstract Background Posttransplant infection after lung transplantation is a common feature due to the immunodeficiency induced by the immunosuppressive load. Aim To assess B-cell subsets in lung transplant recipients suffering at least one episode of infection within the first year posttransplantat...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Transplantation proceedings 2012-11, Vol.44 (9), p.2676-2678 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Abstract Background Posttransplant infection after lung transplantation is a common feature due to the immunodeficiency induced by the immunosuppressive load. Aim To assess B-cell subsets in lung transplant recipients suffering at least one episode of infection within the first year posttransplantation. Methods Twenty-eight lung transplant recipients were enrolled in the study. Their overall mean age was 56.6 ± 10.7 years and 10 were women (35.7%). All recipients were treated with steroids, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil. B-cell subset levels were measured in peripheral blood before as well as 7, 14, 30, 60, 90, and 180 days posttransplantation. Results No difference in the absolute number of B-cell subsets was observed within the first year of follow-up. However, pre–germinal center-activated naïve B cells (Bm2′), defined as IgD+ CD38++ , were increased among patients displaying infections within the first year. The increased Bm2′ subset was accompanied by a decrease in the double negative (CD27− IgD− ) B-cell population. Conclusion Infections in lung transplant recipients were associated with an increase in the Bm2′ subset even before transplantation. It is possible that Bm2′ cells have a role in response to infection in lung transplantation. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0041-1345 1873-2623 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.transproceed.2012.09.105 |