Effect of Escherichia coli-produced recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2 on the regeneration of canine segmental ulnar defects

Because bone morphogenetic protein 2 gene transfected Escherichia coli (E-BMP-2) produce recombinant human BMP-2 (rhBMP-2) more efficiently than mammalian cells (Chinese hamster ovary [CHO]-BMP-2), they may be a more cost-effective source of rhBMP-2 for clinical use. However, use of E-BMP-2 for rege...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of bone and mineral metabolism 2012-07, Vol.30 (4), p.388-399
Hauptverfasser: Harada, Yasuji, Itoi, Takamasa, Wakitani, Shigeyuki, Irie, Hiroyuki, Sakamoto, Michiko, Zhao, Dongwei, Nezu, Yoshinori, Yogo, Takuya, Hara, Yasushi, Tagawa, Masahiro
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Because bone morphogenetic protein 2 gene transfected Escherichia coli (E-BMP-2) produce recombinant human BMP-2 (rhBMP-2) more efficiently than mammalian cells (Chinese hamster ovary [CHO]-BMP-2), they may be a more cost-effective source of rhBMP-2 for clinical use. However, use of E-BMP-2 for regenerating long bones in large animals has not been reported. In the current study, we evaluated the healing efficacy of E-BMP-2 in a canine model. We created 2.5-cm critical-size segmental ulnar defects in test animals, then implanted E-BMP-2 and 700 mg of artificial bone (beta-tricalcium phosphate; β-TCP) into the wounds. We examined the differential effects of 5 E-BMP-2 treatments (0, 35, 140, 560, and 2240 μg) across 5 experimental groups (control, BMP35, BMP140, BMP560, and BMP2240). Radiography and computed tomography were used to observe the regeneration process. The groups in which higher doses of E-BMP-2 were administered (BMP560 and BMP2240) displayed more pronounced bone regeneration; the regenerated tissues connected to the host bone, and the cross-sectional areas of the regenerated bone were larger than those of the originals. The groups in which lower doses of E-BMP-2 were administered (BMP35 and BMP140) experienced relatively less bone regeneration; furthermore, the regenerated tissues failed to connect to the host bone. In these groups, the cross-sectional areas of the regenerated bone were equal to or smaller than those of the originals. No regeneration was observed in the control group. These findings suggest that, like CHO-BMP-2, E-BMP-2 can be used for the regeneration of large defects in long bones and that its clinical use might decrease the cost of bone regeneration treatments.
ISSN:0914-8779
1435-5604
DOI:10.1007/s00774-011-0329-x