Feasibility and economic impact of same-day discharge for women who undergo laparoscopic hysterectomy

Objective We examined the use, safety, and economic impact of same-day discharge for women undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy. Study Design We identified women in the Perspective database who underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy from 2000 through 2010. Discharge was classified as same-day, 1 day, a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of obstetrics and gynecology 2012-11, Vol.207 (5), p.382.e1-382.e9
Hauptverfasser: Schiavone, Maria B., MD, Herzog, Thomas J., MD, Ananth, Cande V., PhD, MPH, Wilde, Elizabeth T., PhD, Lewin, Sharyn N., MD, Burke, William M., MD, Lu, Yu-Shiang, MS, Neugut, Alfred I., MD, PhD, Hershman, Dawn L., MD, Wright, Jason D., MD
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Objective We examined the use, safety, and economic impact of same-day discharge for women undergoing laparoscopic hysterectomy. Study Design We identified women in the Perspective database who underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy from 2000 through 2010. Discharge was classified as same-day, 1 day, and ≥2 days. Multivariable models were used to examine predictors of same-day discharge, reevaluation, and cost. Results Among 128,634 women, 34,070 (26.5%) were discharged on the day of surgery. Same-day discharge increased from 11.3% in 2000 to 46.0% by 2010 ( P < .0001). The rate of reevaluation within 60 days was 4.0% for those discharged same day, 3.6% after a 1-day stay, and 5.1% for patients whose stay was ≥2 days ( P < .0001). In a multivariable model, patients discharged on postoperative day 1 were less likely to require reevaluation (risk ratio, 0.89; 95% confidence interval, 0.82–0.96), but costs were $207 (95% confidence interval, $179–234) greater. Conclusion Same-day discharge after laparoscopic hysterectomy is safe and associated with decreased cost.
ISSN:0002-9378
1097-6868
DOI:10.1016/j.ajog.2012.09.014