Precision of GE Lunar iDXA for the Measurement of Total and Regional Body Composition in Nonobese Adults

Abstract Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is a well-accepted technique for measuring body composition. Knowledge of measurement precision is critical for monitoring of changes in bone mineral content (BMC), and fat and lean masses. The purpose of this study was to characterize in vivo precisio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical densitometry 2012-10, Vol.15 (4), p.399-404
Hauptverfasser: Rothney, Megan P, Martin, Francois-Pierre, Xia, Yi, Beaumont, Maurice, Davis, Cynthia, Ergun, David, Fay, Laurent, Ginty, Fiona, Kochhar, Sunil, Wacker, Wynn, Rezzi, Serge
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 404
container_issue 4
container_start_page 399
container_title Journal of clinical densitometry
container_volume 15
creator Rothney, Megan P
Martin, Francois-Pierre
Xia, Yi
Beaumont, Maurice
Davis, Cynthia
Ergun, David
Fay, Laurent
Ginty, Fiona
Kochhar, Sunil
Wacker, Wynn
Rezzi, Serge
description Abstract Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is a well-accepted technique for measuring body composition. Knowledge of measurement precision is critical for monitoring of changes in bone mineral content (BMC), and fat and lean masses. The purpose of this study was to characterize in vivo precision of total body and regional body composition parameters using the GE Lunar iDXA (GE Healthcare Lunar, Madison, WI) system in a sample of nonobese subjects. We also evaluated the difference between expert and automatic region-of-interest (ROI) analysis on body composition precision. To this end, 2 total body scans were performed on each subject with repositioning between scans. Total body precision for BMC, fat and lean mass were 0.5%, 1.0%, and 0.5% coefficient of variation (CV), respectively. Regional body composition precision error was less than 2.5% CV for all regions except arms. Precision error was higher for the arms (CV: BMC 1.5%; fat mass 2.8%; lean mass 1.6%), likely owing to the placement of arms relative to torso leading to differences in ROI. There was a significant correlation between auto ROI and expert ROI ( r > 0.99). Small, but statistically significant differences were found between auto and manual ROI. Differences were small in total body, leg, trunk, and android and gynoid regions (0.004–2.8%), but larger in arm region (3.0–6.3%). Total body and regional precision for iDXA are small and it is suggested that iDXA may be useful for monitoring changes in body composition during longitudinal trials.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jocd.2012.02.009
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1124755038</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1094695012000248</els_id><sourcerecordid>1124755038</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-4eb604c7b33491100ee3aa6e8182e6b6c6f9e894071b03e8579e9b22e19a38dd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kV-L1DAUxYso7rr6BXyQPPrS8SZNmwZEmB3XVRj_oCv4FtLk1k1tkzFphfn2pszqgw-GC0ngnAP3d4riKYUNBdq8GDZDMHbDgLIN5AF5rzindS1LEFzcz2-QvGxkDWfFo5QGAEZpKx4WZ4zVnOVzXtx-imhccsGT0JPrK7JfvI7Evf62JX2IZL5F8h51WiJO6OdVdBNmPRLtLfmM37Mxfy6DPZJdmA4huXnNcp58CD50mJBs7TLO6XHxoNdjwid390Xx9c3Vze5tuf94_W633ZeGCzGXHLsGuBFdVXFJKQBipXWDLW0ZNl1jml5iKzkI2kGFbS0kyo4xpFJXrbXVRfH8lHuI4eeCaVaTSwbHUXsMS1KUMi7qGqo2S9lJamJIKWKvDtFNOh4VBbUSVoNaCauVsII8ILPp2V3-0k1o_1r-IM2ClycB5i1_OYwqGYfeoHUZ9axscP_Pf_WP3YzOO6PHH3jENIQlZuJ5D5WyQX1ZO14rpgxyv7ytfgMCkqAh</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1124755038</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Precision of GE Lunar iDXA for the Measurement of Total and Regional Body Composition in Nonobese Adults</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Rothney, Megan P ; Martin, Francois-Pierre ; Xia, Yi ; Beaumont, Maurice ; Davis, Cynthia ; Ergun, David ; Fay, Laurent ; Ginty, Fiona ; Kochhar, Sunil ; Wacker, Wynn ; Rezzi, Serge</creator><creatorcontrib>Rothney, Megan P ; Martin, Francois-Pierre ; Xia, Yi ; Beaumont, Maurice ; Davis, Cynthia ; Ergun, David ; Fay, Laurent ; Ginty, Fiona ; Kochhar, Sunil ; Wacker, Wynn ; Rezzi, Serge</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is a well-accepted technique for measuring body composition. Knowledge of measurement precision is critical for monitoring of changes in bone mineral content (BMC), and fat and lean masses. The purpose of this study was to characterize in vivo precision of total body and regional body composition parameters using the GE Lunar iDXA (GE Healthcare Lunar, Madison, WI) system in a sample of nonobese subjects. We also evaluated the difference between expert and automatic region-of-interest (ROI) analysis on body composition precision. To this end, 2 total body scans were performed on each subject with repositioning between scans. Total body precision for BMC, fat and lean mass were 0.5%, 1.0%, and 0.5% coefficient of variation (CV), respectively. Regional body composition precision error was less than 2.5% CV for all regions except arms. Precision error was higher for the arms (CV: BMC 1.5%; fat mass 2.8%; lean mass 1.6%), likely owing to the placement of arms relative to torso leading to differences in ROI. There was a significant correlation between auto ROI and expert ROI ( r &gt; 0.99). Small, but statistically significant differences were found between auto and manual ROI. Differences were small in total body, leg, trunk, and android and gynoid regions (0.004–2.8%), but larger in arm region (3.0–6.3%). Total body and regional precision for iDXA are small and it is suggested that iDXA may be useful for monitoring changes in body composition during longitudinal trials.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1094-6950</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1559-0747</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jocd.2012.02.009</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22542222</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Absorptiometry, Photon - instrumentation ; Adult ; Body composition ; Body Composition - physiology ; Bone Density ; DXA ; Endocrinology &amp; Metabolism ; Equipment Design ; Female ; Humans ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Obesity ; precision ; Reproducibility of Results ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of clinical densitometry, 2012-10, Vol.15 (4), p.399-404</ispartof><rights>The International Society for Clinical Densitometry</rights><rights>2012 The International Society for Clinical Densitometry</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 The International Society for Clinical Densitometry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-4eb604c7b33491100ee3aa6e8182e6b6c6f9e894071b03e8579e9b22e19a38dd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-4eb604c7b33491100ee3aa6e8182e6b6c6f9e894071b03e8579e9b22e19a38dd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jocd.2012.02.009$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,3551,27929,27930,46000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22542222$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Rothney, Megan P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Francois-Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xia, Yi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beaumont, Maurice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, Cynthia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ergun, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fay, Laurent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ginty, Fiona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kochhar, Sunil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wacker, Wynn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rezzi, Serge</creatorcontrib><title>Precision of GE Lunar iDXA for the Measurement of Total and Regional Body Composition in Nonobese Adults</title><title>Journal of clinical densitometry</title><addtitle>J Clin Densitom</addtitle><description>Abstract Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is a well-accepted technique for measuring body composition. Knowledge of measurement precision is critical for monitoring of changes in bone mineral content (BMC), and fat and lean masses. The purpose of this study was to characterize in vivo precision of total body and regional body composition parameters using the GE Lunar iDXA (GE Healthcare Lunar, Madison, WI) system in a sample of nonobese subjects. We also evaluated the difference between expert and automatic region-of-interest (ROI) analysis on body composition precision. To this end, 2 total body scans were performed on each subject with repositioning between scans. Total body precision for BMC, fat and lean mass were 0.5%, 1.0%, and 0.5% coefficient of variation (CV), respectively. Regional body composition precision error was less than 2.5% CV for all regions except arms. Precision error was higher for the arms (CV: BMC 1.5%; fat mass 2.8%; lean mass 1.6%), likely owing to the placement of arms relative to torso leading to differences in ROI. There was a significant correlation between auto ROI and expert ROI ( r &gt; 0.99). Small, but statistically significant differences were found between auto and manual ROI. Differences were small in total body, leg, trunk, and android and gynoid regions (0.004–2.8%), but larger in arm region (3.0–6.3%). Total body and regional precision for iDXA are small and it is suggested that iDXA may be useful for monitoring changes in body composition during longitudinal trials.</description><subject>Absorptiometry, Photon - instrumentation</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Body composition</subject><subject>Body Composition - physiology</subject><subject>Bone Density</subject><subject>DXA</subject><subject>Endocrinology &amp; Metabolism</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Obesity</subject><subject>precision</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1094-6950</issn><issn>1559-0747</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kV-L1DAUxYso7rr6BXyQPPrS8SZNmwZEmB3XVRj_oCv4FtLk1k1tkzFphfn2pszqgw-GC0ngnAP3d4riKYUNBdq8GDZDMHbDgLIN5AF5rzindS1LEFzcz2-QvGxkDWfFo5QGAEZpKx4WZ4zVnOVzXtx-imhccsGT0JPrK7JfvI7Evf62JX2IZL5F8h51WiJO6OdVdBNmPRLtLfmM37Mxfy6DPZJdmA4huXnNcp58CD50mJBs7TLO6XHxoNdjwid390Xx9c3Vze5tuf94_W633ZeGCzGXHLsGuBFdVXFJKQBipXWDLW0ZNl1jml5iKzkI2kGFbS0kyo4xpFJXrbXVRfH8lHuI4eeCaVaTSwbHUXsMS1KUMi7qGqo2S9lJamJIKWKvDtFNOh4VBbUSVoNaCauVsII8ILPp2V3-0k1o_1r-IM2ClycB5i1_OYwqGYfeoHUZ9axscP_Pf_WP3YzOO6PHH3jENIQlZuJ5D5WyQX1ZO14rpgxyv7ytfgMCkqAh</recordid><startdate>20121001</startdate><enddate>20121001</enddate><creator>Rothney, Megan P</creator><creator>Martin, Francois-Pierre</creator><creator>Xia, Yi</creator><creator>Beaumont, Maurice</creator><creator>Davis, Cynthia</creator><creator>Ergun, David</creator><creator>Fay, Laurent</creator><creator>Ginty, Fiona</creator><creator>Kochhar, Sunil</creator><creator>Wacker, Wynn</creator><creator>Rezzi, Serge</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121001</creationdate><title>Precision of GE Lunar iDXA for the Measurement of Total and Regional Body Composition in Nonobese Adults</title><author>Rothney, Megan P ; Martin, Francois-Pierre ; Xia, Yi ; Beaumont, Maurice ; Davis, Cynthia ; Ergun, David ; Fay, Laurent ; Ginty, Fiona ; Kochhar, Sunil ; Wacker, Wynn ; Rezzi, Serge</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-4eb604c7b33491100ee3aa6e8182e6b6c6f9e894071b03e8579e9b22e19a38dd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Absorptiometry, Photon - instrumentation</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Body composition</topic><topic>Body Composition - physiology</topic><topic>Bone Density</topic><topic>DXA</topic><topic>Endocrinology &amp; Metabolism</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Obesity</topic><topic>precision</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Rothney, Megan P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Martin, Francois-Pierre</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xia, Yi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beaumont, Maurice</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Davis, Cynthia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ergun, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fay, Laurent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ginty, Fiona</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kochhar, Sunil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wacker, Wynn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rezzi, Serge</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of clinical densitometry</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Rothney, Megan P</au><au>Martin, Francois-Pierre</au><au>Xia, Yi</au><au>Beaumont, Maurice</au><au>Davis, Cynthia</au><au>Ergun, David</au><au>Fay, Laurent</au><au>Ginty, Fiona</au><au>Kochhar, Sunil</au><au>Wacker, Wynn</au><au>Rezzi, Serge</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Precision of GE Lunar iDXA for the Measurement of Total and Regional Body Composition in Nonobese Adults</atitle><jtitle>Journal of clinical densitometry</jtitle><addtitle>J Clin Densitom</addtitle><date>2012-10-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>399</spage><epage>404</epage><pages>399-404</pages><issn>1094-6950</issn><eissn>1559-0747</eissn><abstract>Abstract Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is a well-accepted technique for measuring body composition. Knowledge of measurement precision is critical for monitoring of changes in bone mineral content (BMC), and fat and lean masses. The purpose of this study was to characterize in vivo precision of total body and regional body composition parameters using the GE Lunar iDXA (GE Healthcare Lunar, Madison, WI) system in a sample of nonobese subjects. We also evaluated the difference between expert and automatic region-of-interest (ROI) analysis on body composition precision. To this end, 2 total body scans were performed on each subject with repositioning between scans. Total body precision for BMC, fat and lean mass were 0.5%, 1.0%, and 0.5% coefficient of variation (CV), respectively. Regional body composition precision error was less than 2.5% CV for all regions except arms. Precision error was higher for the arms (CV: BMC 1.5%; fat mass 2.8%; lean mass 1.6%), likely owing to the placement of arms relative to torso leading to differences in ROI. There was a significant correlation between auto ROI and expert ROI ( r &gt; 0.99). Small, but statistically significant differences were found between auto and manual ROI. Differences were small in total body, leg, trunk, and android and gynoid regions (0.004–2.8%), but larger in arm region (3.0–6.3%). Total body and regional precision for iDXA are small and it is suggested that iDXA may be useful for monitoring changes in body composition during longitudinal trials.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>22542222</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jocd.2012.02.009</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1094-6950
ispartof Journal of clinical densitometry, 2012-10, Vol.15 (4), p.399-404
issn 1094-6950
1559-0747
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1124755038
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Absorptiometry, Photon - instrumentation
Adult
Body composition
Body Composition - physiology
Bone Density
DXA
Endocrinology & Metabolism
Equipment Design
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Obesity
precision
Reproducibility of Results
Young Adult
title Precision of GE Lunar iDXA for the Measurement of Total and Regional Body Composition in Nonobese Adults
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-16T02%3A35%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Precision%20of%20GE%20Lunar%20iDXA%20for%20the%20Measurement%20of%20Total%20and%20Regional%20Body%20Composition%20in%20Nonobese%20Adults&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20clinical%20densitometry&rft.au=Rothney,%20Megan%20P&rft.date=2012-10-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=399&rft.epage=404&rft.pages=399-404&rft.issn=1094-6950&rft.eissn=1559-0747&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jocd.2012.02.009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1124755038%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1124755038&rft_id=info:pmid/22542222&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S1094695012000248&rfr_iscdi=true