Precision of GE Lunar iDXA for the Measurement of Total and Regional Body Composition in Nonobese Adults

Abstract Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is a well-accepted technique for measuring body composition. Knowledge of measurement precision is critical for monitoring of changes in bone mineral content (BMC), and fat and lean masses. The purpose of this study was to characterize in vivo precisio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of clinical densitometry 2012-10, Vol.15 (4), p.399-404
Hauptverfasser: Rothney, Megan P, Martin, Francois-Pierre, Xia, Yi, Beaumont, Maurice, Davis, Cynthia, Ergun, David, Fay, Laurent, Ginty, Fiona, Kochhar, Sunil, Wacker, Wynn, Rezzi, Serge
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Abstract Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is a well-accepted technique for measuring body composition. Knowledge of measurement precision is critical for monitoring of changes in bone mineral content (BMC), and fat and lean masses. The purpose of this study was to characterize in vivo precision of total body and regional body composition parameters using the GE Lunar iDXA (GE Healthcare Lunar, Madison, WI) system in a sample of nonobese subjects. We also evaluated the difference between expert and automatic region-of-interest (ROI) analysis on body composition precision. To this end, 2 total body scans were performed on each subject with repositioning between scans. Total body precision for BMC, fat and lean mass were 0.5%, 1.0%, and 0.5% coefficient of variation (CV), respectively. Regional body composition precision error was less than 2.5% CV for all regions except arms. Precision error was higher for the arms (CV: BMC 1.5%; fat mass 2.8%; lean mass 1.6%), likely owing to the placement of arms relative to torso leading to differences in ROI. There was a significant correlation between auto ROI and expert ROI ( r > 0.99). Small, but statistically significant differences were found between auto and manual ROI. Differences were small in total body, leg, trunk, and android and gynoid regions (0.004–2.8%), but larger in arm region (3.0–6.3%). Total body and regional precision for iDXA are small and it is suggested that iDXA may be useful for monitoring changes in body composition during longitudinal trials.
ISSN:1094-6950
1559-0747
DOI:10.1016/j.jocd.2012.02.009