MRI-based clinical trials in relapsing–remitting MS: new sample size calculations based on a longitudinal model

Background: Sample sizes for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based clinical trials in multiple sclerosis (MS) generally assume that lesion counts are reasonably described by the negative binomial (NB) model. Objective: This study aimed to assess the appropriateness of the NB model for lesion count...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Multiple sclerosis 2012-11, Vol.18 (11), p.1600-1608
Hauptverfasser: Altman, RM, Petkau, AJ, Vrecko, D, Smith, A
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:Background: Sample sizes for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based clinical trials in multiple sclerosis (MS) generally assume that lesion counts are reasonably described by the negative binomial (NB) model. Objective: This study aimed to assess the appropriateness of the NB model for lesion count data and to provide sample sizes for placebo-controlled, MRI-based clinical trials in relapsing–remitting MS using a more realistic model. Methods: The fit of the NB model in each arm of five MS clinical trials was assessed using Pearson’s chi-squared statistic. Required sample sizes associated with various tests of treatment effect were estimated by simulating data from a new, longitudinal model for repeated lesion count data on individual patients. Results: Evidence (p < 0.05) against the NB model was found in at least one arm of four of the five trials. If a trial is designed using this model but the resulting clinical data do not follow its assumptions then this trial can be seriously under-powered for assessing differences in mean lesion counts. Conclusion: Sample sizes based on the longitudinal model are more realistic and often smaller than those previously reported using the NB model.
ISSN:1352-4585
1477-0970
DOI:10.1177/1352458512444326