MRI-based clinical trials in relapsing–remitting MS: new sample size calculations based on a longitudinal model
Background: Sample sizes for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based clinical trials in multiple sclerosis (MS) generally assume that lesion counts are reasonably described by the negative binomial (NB) model. Objective: This study aimed to assess the appropriateness of the NB model for lesion count...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Multiple sclerosis 2012-11, Vol.18 (11), p.1600-1608 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
Zusammenfassung: | Background:
Sample sizes for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based clinical trials in multiple sclerosis (MS) generally assume that lesion counts are reasonably described by the negative binomial (NB) model.
Objective:
This study aimed to assess the appropriateness of the NB model for lesion count data and to provide sample sizes for placebo-controlled, MRI-based clinical trials in relapsing–remitting MS using a more realistic model.
Methods:
The fit of the NB model in each arm of five MS clinical trials was assessed using Pearson’s chi-squared statistic. Required sample sizes associated with various tests of treatment effect were estimated by simulating data from a new, longitudinal model for repeated lesion count data on individual patients.
Results:
Evidence (p < 0.05) against the NB model was found in at least one arm of four of the five trials. If a trial is designed using this model but the resulting clinical data do not follow its assumptions then this trial can be seriously under-powered for assessing differences in mean lesion counts.
Conclusion:
Sample sizes based on the longitudinal model are more realistic and often smaller than those previously reported using the NB model. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1352-4585 1477-0970 |
DOI: | 10.1177/1352458512444326 |